Search for: "J M J J Ltd" Results 581 - 600 of 766
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2011, 10:55 pm by Alasdair Henderson
M, S, an NHS PCT and Times Newspapers Ltd. [2011] EQHC 1197 (COP) – read judgment. [read post]
17 May 2011, 12:39 pm by John Elwood
McIntryre Machinery, Ltd. v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:29 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
With a Preface from the President of the International Bar Association, the book also brings together further chapters from a diverse group of senior and up-and-coming academics and practitioners expert in these fields: - Preface (by Akira Kawamura) - Investment Arbitration in Asia: Five Perspectives on Law and Practice (Luke Nottage and J. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 7:43 am by PRATER, DUNCAN & CRAIG 770-253-7778
Tully, Goodwin Procter LLP, Boston 5 $269,431,798 Breach of Contract Celador International Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 1:56 pm
This was denied by Mann J so a renewed application on notice was made the following day, which was successful. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 1:37 am
SourcesFirst instance ruling in Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v iiNet Ltd [2010] FCA 24 (4 February 2010) hereAppeal decision in Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v iiNet Ltd [2011] FCAFC 23 (24 February 2011) here [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:26 am by INFORRM
The motion judge, Belobaba, J. disagreed and dismissed the defendants’ motion and held that the Ontario court had jurisdiction over the actions and Ontario was the convenient and appropriate forum. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 5:16 pm by Bruce Ackerman
Galbraith, LBJ School of Public Affairs, University of Texas at AustinHerbert J G [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 1:32 am by INFORRM
Cook v Telegraph Media Group Ltd heard 25 February 2011 (Tugendhat J) [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
In Metropolitan International Schools v Designtechnica [2009] EWHC 1765 (QB) at [35] Eady J commented that it was “surprising how little authority there is within this jurisdiction applying the common law of publication or its modern statutory refinements to internet communications”, and the same is the case in Australia[5]. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
(Professor Brown notes the English Court of Appeal admitted this in Loutchansky v Times Newspapers Ltd (Nos 2 – 5) [2002] 2 WLR 640 at 653.) [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 10:40 pm by Stephen Page
That approach was adopted by Strickland J in Parker v Parker [2010] FamCA 664 (3 August 2010). [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 3:29 am by Marie Louise
(IP Watch) Canada Déjà vu all over again on copyright and Canada/US trade? [read post]