Search for: "J True"
Results 581 - 600
of 7,732
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2023, 1:34 pm
That's true whether you are an originalist, a living constitutionalist, or some combination of both. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 3:44 am
Lord Leggatt gives a concurring judgment, adding observations about the defect in the law which Mostyn J’s judgment had exposed. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 7:45 am
S. ___, ___ (2019) (THOMAS, J., concurring in denial of certiorari) (slip op., at 2). [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
”[12] It was true then and it remains true today: competition in banking and competition throughout our economy go hand in hand. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:41 am
People lie. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:36 am
., at 839 (Brennan, J., concurring); cf. 5 U. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
[Here's a draft of my article, on the constitutionality of anti-BDS laws and other related matters, forthcoming in a symposium at The University of the Pacific Law Review.] [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:58 am
The scientific evidence may weigh, even heavily, in favor of one side or the other, but these issues cannot be decided on the pleadings, whose allegations we must accept as true, or a request for judicial notice, whose exhibits cre [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 2:49 am
Mellor J, the Judge, explained that in very general terms he adopted the same approach as that of Birss J in Unwired Planet v Huawei [2017] EWHC 711 (Pat) ([42]). [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm
This bibliography comprises scholarly books, book chapters, and journal articles published or accepted for publication by full-time, emeritus, and retired faculty of the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law between April 1, 2023 and June 30, 2023. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 3:11 pm
Even if it is true that a defendant may not be punished under both (c) and (j) for the same conduct, “that aligns with our conclusion here: If a defendant receives a sentence under subsection (j), he does not receive a sentence ‘imposed under subsection (c)’ that would trigger the consecutive-sentence mandate. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 10:01 am
My students Pareesa Darafshi, Gerardo Valentino Gorospe IV, and Philip Raucci and I just submitted this brief on behalf of the Academic Freedom Alliance in Pernell & Novoa v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:29 am
On appeal, the Ontario Court of Appeal overturned Morgan J. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am
[Eric’s note: this is the post you’ve been waiting for: Prof. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
This is no less true of swaps than other areas. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:26 am
Although those museums embody a true library of the world, one major problem is hidden in those museums: many well-known objects — like the Rosetta Stone, Hoa Hakananai’a, and the Marble head of Athena — have disputed ownership. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:25 pm
These include the fundamental issue of what must be true to establish the defence, whether the defendant continues to have the burden of proving that a defamatory communication is true, the condition that publication must be for the public benefit or in the public interest, “contextual truth” (“incremental harm”), and the possibility of constitutional law rules on truth that are different than common law rules. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
The same was true for claims that a rap song helped motivate a listener to murder a police officer, see Davidson v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
The bills were run up because Democrats spent money they didn’t have when they controlled Congress, whereas Republicans are now trying to clean up the mess.But that’s also not true. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 10:52 am
The same is true of section 2(a), freedom of religion, which protects a very broad view of religious beliefs that do not require any kind of “objective” or “expert” proof (Amselem). [read post]