Search for: "JOHN DOE AND PREDECESSORS"
Results 581 - 600
of 758
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2017, 10:55 am
” John M. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 7:08 am
The standing president must ignore the crimes of his predecessor. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 11:39 am
Sullivan’s opposition to subsistence rights does not stop with the Pebble Mine. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 4:46 am
Wickremesinghe also said that constitutional amendments were required to curtail presidential powers — indicating he would meet a key demand of protesters who forced out his predecessor, Gotabaya Rajapaksa. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 9:36 am
But it does not extend to noncapital cases, and no comparable bill has been introduced in the House of Representatives. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 8:32 am
That distinction, I believe, goes to John Bellinger, who in December 2015 wrote a piece titled “Donald Trump is a Danger to Our National Security. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 8:21 am
Yet on very few questions—other than the facts of what he turns up—does more depend. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Did John B. [read post]
23 May 2017, 12:40 pm
According to Wilkinson, the law of war does not apply in this case because Al Qaeda did not meet the intensity and organization prongs required to establish a non-international armed conflict (NIAC). [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 1:26 pm
The first three years of the Trump administration, as John Hudak has noted on the Brookings Institution’s FixGov blog, saw the departure of 37 inspectors general. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 5:41 am
Dicey (legislative omnipotence), Thomas Jefferson (departmentalism and active popular sovereignty that does not go dormant in non-Ackermanian moments), James Madison (a system of checks and balances reduced to a short code), or John Marshall (judicial supremacy based on an instrument that did not say a word about judicial supremacy when he wrote Marbury and continued silent on that point when his successors affixed each of their signatures to Aaron v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 8:20 am
Senate Antitrust Subcommittee hearing, I could smell the fear radiating off of Eric Schmidt even from ten feet away and so could Senator John Cornyn. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:02 pm
These decisions were the product of the Court’s grappling with a hard question: What does it mean to discriminate on the basis of sex? [read post]
25 May 2018, 9:21 pm
What implications does it have for Cuban politics and the course of reforms? [read post]
4 May 2022, 5:01 am
PATH 1: CRIMINAL PROSECUTION By charging Steve Bannon with contempt, the current Justice Department has gone farther in upholding Congress’s authority than any of its recent predecessors. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
The courts of the 2020s appear no bolder than their 1990s predecessors. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 1:53 pm
The Roberts court today is less likely than its predecessors to approve of innovative theories presented by entrepreneurial plaintiffs’ attorneys. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 8:04 pm
John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 17-18 (1966)). [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:30 am
” It does not announce any new legal standard (binding or otherwise). [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 3:05 pm
Illinois Department of Revenue, leaves them in place, or does something in between, “Congress can act. [read post]
