Search for: "James v. Appel" Results 581 - 600 of 2,955
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2019, 1:21 pm by MOTP
"Whether parties have agreed to arbitrate is a gateway matter ordinarily committed to the trial court and controlled by state law governing `the validity, revocability, and enforceability of contracts generally.'" Jody James Farms, JV v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 10:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Register at this link.From Yale Law School’s Abrams Institute for Freedom of Speech - The 4th Commercial Speech and Commercial Speech ConferenceCOMMERCIAL SPEECH POST-NIFLA v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 7:23 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Jury instruction — Perfect self-defense On January 16, 2018, a jury in the Circuit Court for Worcester County convicted Jordan James Kuzma (“Kuzma”), appellant, of second-degree assault, carrying a dangerous weapon with the intent to injure another, and possessing an assisted knife in Ocean City, Maryland. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 7:47 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Jury instruction — Ammunition possession by prohibited person A jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City convicted Maurice James Harrison, appellant, of possession of a regulated firearm by a prohibited person; wearing, carrying, or transporting a handgun in a vehicle; conspiracy to wear, carry, or transport a handgun; and possession of ... [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:17 pm by Rachael Hanna
Watkins said that following the RMC 802 session, he had reviewed all the classified pleadings relevant to resolve Appellate Exhibit (AE) 030C. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 12:46 pm by Jacques Singer-Emery
After the recap, Clayton Trivett, counsel for the government, asked if the commission had ruled on which portions of the discussion of Appellate Exhibits (AE) 600, 601 and 574 would be open and which closed. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Envirocon Environmental Services, ULC v. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 7:53 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
Last month, the SCOTUS ruled in Timbs v Indiana that a state's fine or forfeiture scheme may be excessive and thus unconstitutional under the 8th Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 1:54 am by Ben
District Judge James L. [read post]