Search for: "Jersey City v. United States" Results 581 - 600 of 743
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2024, 2:08 pm by Ben Sperry
  It also bears noting that, in the years since the original consent agreements, both the City of San Jose, California, and the State of New Jersey have passed legislation that would, in fact, mandate that gun owners carry the kinds of liability insurance that Vullo contended were impermissible under insurance law (see R.J. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
New Jersey Court Rejects Reverse Discrimination Claims Based on Speculative EvidenceHunter v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 1:11 am
Supreme Court declined to review the New Jersey Supreme Court's ruling that rent-to-own agreements violate the state's usury law. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Taft, Anti-Semitism in the United States (1920) Benjamin N. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
That led to fireworks on the floor of the United States Senate in 2005. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 12:08 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Too Much Media v Hale the New Jersey ruled this week that blogger Shellee Hale was not a journalist entitled to protect confidential sources and newsgathering information under the State’s “shield law”. [read post]
27 May 2020, 8:29 am by John Elwood
State Bar of Wisconsin, 19-831Issue: Whether Lathrop v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:03 pm by Joshua Burd
Under the policy, non-Mexican asylum applicants who enter the United States at the nation’s southern border must wait in Mexico while their applications are processed. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
The two companies will also pay a combined $3.3 million civil penalty to the United States as well as to Alabama and Louisiana, and $200,000 to Louisiana organ [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" This basic principle, namely that the requirement of probable cause to permit entry into a private home is not excused based upon any relative perceived societal importance, was further articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Mincey v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
China considered sold ‘within the United States’ for infringement purposes: SEB S.A. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 5:03 pm by Bill Marler
  In the 1970s, identification of the virus, and development of serologic tests helped differentiate hepatitis A from other types of non-B hepatitis.[5] Until 2004, HAV was the most frequently reported type of hepatitis in the United States. [read post]