Search for: "Jersey City v. United States" Results 581 - 600 of 737
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
Supreme Court ruling in "Quon" highlights importance of employer technology-usage and privacy policiesPrepared by Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLPOn June 17, 2010, the United States Supreme Court unanimously decided City of Ontario v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
(IP:JUR) A single EU patent looks dead in the water as member states seek alternatives (IAM) Neither democracy nor constitution: is it time to reign in EPO rule-making? [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm by Duncan
(IP:JUR) A single EU patent looks dead in the water as member states seek alternatives (IAM) Neither democracy nor constitution: is it time to reign in EPO rule-making? [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 9:19 am by James (Jim) P. Flynn
Quon, the United States Supreme Court decided that the City of Ontario, California could review the non-work-related text messages to and from a City police officer on a City-issued electronic pager. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am by Steven M. Taber
Judge Levi issued a 2002 order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am by smtaber
Judge Levi issued a 2002 order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the United States. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:16 am by law shucks
Desmarais is also registered to practice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:00 am by Jonathan I. Nirenberg
On May 24, 2010, the United States Supreme Court decided another employment law case. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:00 am
On May 24, 2010, the United States Supreme Court decided another employment law case. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 7:00 am by Jonathan I. Nirenberg
On May 24, 2010, the United States Supreme Court decided another employment law case. [read post]
13 May 2010, 1:40 pm by Fred Goldsmith
The White City, 285 U.S. 195, 52 S.Ct. 347, 76 L.Ed. 699 (1932), and thus that it could not be subject to an implied contractual warranty. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
The company has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $310,000, of which $155,000 will be paid to the United States and the other $155,000 to Virginia. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 3:54 pm by William Morriss
About a week later, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments in City of Ontario v. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 12:08 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Too Much Media v Hale the New Jersey ruled this week that blogger Shellee Hale was not a journalist entitled to protect confidential sources and newsgathering information under the State’s “shield law”. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
  His successor could take a broader view of the extent to which federal law controls, which would allow fewer state-law tort suits to proceed. [read post]