Search for: "John Does 1 And 2" Results 581 - 600 of 10,126
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2018, 8:58 am
Finally, the fact that Kronebusch's fire extinguishers have enjoyed significant exposure in media and at tradeshows does not mean that consumers have become conditioned to recognize this handle design as a trademark.And so the Board affirmed the refusal to register under Sections 1, 2, and 45 of the Lanham Act. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 11:18 am
Does 1-27, the case targeting students at the University of Maine, in which two "John Does" are represented by student attorneys from the University of Maine School of Law's Cumberland Legal Aid Clinic, and in which the Magistrate Judge has suggested Rule 11 sanctions against the RIAA lawyers for improper joinder, the Cumberland Legal Aid Clinic has filed a Rule 11 motion based on:--the RIAA's use of the ex parte "John… [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 6:14 am
Corporation of Charleston, 1 S.C.L. (1 Bay) 441 (S.C. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 10:28 am
If this is a John Doe case, does that make it the first against Twitter? [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 6:27 pm by Harry
Continued from Part 1 You can use an Escrow to ensure the payment of money or delivery of property (such as source code of software) based on future conditions. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 7:10 pm
Reversing a Section 2(e)(1) refusal, the Board found the mark GAMESTUDIO not merely descriptive of an on-line simulated securities exchange game. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
TracFone sought leave to serve Britton “via international mail to the Quebec Central Authority … pursuant to [Rule] 4(f)(1).” It sought leave to serve both defendants by Fedex sent by the clerk pursuant to Rule 4(f)(2)(C)(ii). [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 6:11 am
Offensive collateral estoppel could not be invoked by plaintiff because the underlying state case had (1) no determination of probable cause because the case was dismissed on other grounds and (2) no mutuality. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 9:01 am
The court does not place value on any separate property obtained before or during the marriage. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 3:43 am by John L. Welch
The Board dismissed this Section 2(e)(1) opposition to registration of the mark HEALTHY HOME VACUUM, finding it not merely descriptive of vacuum cleaners [VACUUM disclaimed]. [read post]