Search for: "John T Collins"
Results 581 - 600
of 891
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2010, 12:30 am
Lord Rodger (with whom Lords Walker and Collins and Sir John Dyson SCJ expressly agreed), at para [82] and Lord Hope, at para [35], provided detailed guidance in respect of the test to be applied by the lower tribunals and courts in determining claims for asylum protection based on sexual orientation. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 2:34 am
I don’t think they’re going to get very far. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 12:00 pm
McCarthy with the assistance of Senior Investigator John Slevin. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 8:08 am
Moderator: Professor Michele Butts, John Marshall Law School (Atlanta). [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 2:43 pm
But I don’t think I can promote that idea. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:27 pm
John Collins in this article cited earlier (at pp. 159-60) and restated in his recent book on Adam and Eve (pp. 120-21):1. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Of this book, the American Monthly reviewer wrote: [T]he work is a rare union of patience, brilliancy, and acuteness, and . . . [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 3:09 am
Psystar (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Astrolabe – The daylight-saving data dispute: Astrolabe v Olson (IPKat) Collins, Patrick – ‘Copyright Trolls’ unite to prevent downfall of BitTorrent lawsuits: Patrick Collins v John Does 1-58 (TorrentFreak) Felton, E Prof – Princeton scientists sue over squelched research (EFF) Viacom – Viacom tells appeals court YouTube profited from… [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 8:01 pm
I don't think it's justice. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 2:59 am
’ Lord Bingham, DPP v Collins (here). [read post]
14 May 2010, 8:13 am
David Savage offers a detailed recap of Kagan’s opposition to the military’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy in the Los Angeles Times. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 1:24 pm
I can't wait till next week's! [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
11 May 2023, 5:29 am
— How do other 2024 candidates hope to defeat the former president in a head-to-head matchup if they won't even challenge him? [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:02 am
Where it is in the system, I don’t know. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 12:04 pm
Collins, 506 U.S. 390 (1993). [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 4:08 pm
I don't know. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 4:15 am
Motives aren't irrelevant. [read post]
10 May 2009, 2:19 pm
If a movie can't compare favorably to time-traveling episodes in Star Trek history (many of which were excellent: the one with Kirk and Joan Collins, the "All Good Things" series finale of TNG), then what's the point? [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 10:28 am
” Certainly even the Durham attorneys aren’t suggesting that the Duke plaintiffs have failed to state specific civil rights claims—or that Reade Seligmann, Collin Finnerty, and Dave Evans have “little interest in or knowledge and understanding of the case. [read post]
