Search for: "Jordan v. R "
Results 581 - 600
of 884
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2010, 3:06 am
Jordan (3d Dept. 1999) - $800,000 upheld for unnecessary mastectomy Lopez v. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 7:34 pm
In R. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 4:40 pm
Judge Jordan dissented. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 10:12 am
Jordan M. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:24 am
Lachaux v Independent Print, heard 13 and 14 November 2018 (UKSC) R (on the application of Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal, heard 3 and 4 December 2018 (UKSC) Bull v Desporte, heard 25 to 28 March 2019 (Julian Knowles J) Sadik v Sadik, heard 2 April 2019 (Julian Knowles J). [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 1:59 pm
Jurecic sat down with Scott R. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:14 pm
Elena Kagan and Alan Rozenshtein analyzed the five-hour Thompson v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 4:39 pm
(See In re Jordan (1992) 4 Cal.4th 116 (Jordan).) [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 4:45 am
Réunion? [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 9:10 am
LAW LIBRARY level 3: KF250 .C345 2018Charles R. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 5:45 am
Smith and Kurt R. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 4:33 am
Miriam Jordan reports for the New York Times. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 11:45 am
S3 (April 2019)- Special issue on "Resilience from the Ground Up," with 8 articles.Journal of Humanitarian Affairs, vol. 1, no. 1 (2019) - Inaugural issue, with 10 articles.Hybrid Open Access [info]"Error Rates for Unvalidated Medical Age Assessment Procedures," International Journal of Legal Medicine, vol. 133, no. 2 (March 2019)Law Reviews"Language as a Canary: The Role of Language in the Refugee Regime," Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, vol. 56, no. 4… [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 9:38 pm
Cute if unkind, but it's worth reflecting on when we consider Mandela v., oh well, almost anybody else in Africa. [read post]
8 May 2011, 6:03 pm
Jordan, (9th Cir.2010).Judge Koh denied the motion to dismiss. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 4:02 am
Ltd v Phonographic Performance Limited (1709 Copyright Blog) Indian ‘Bayh Dole’ problems: some resources (Spicy IP) Patent scoreboard: January 2010 (Patent Circle) Bombay High Court declines to hear interim compulsory licensing applications; shows the Appellant the way to the Copyright Board: Music Choice India Pvt Ltd v Phonographic Performance Ltd (Spicy IP) Payyanur Ring geographical indication: religious sentiment no bar to registration: Payyannur Pavithra Ring,… [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
See Lujan v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
See Lujan v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
ASARCO engaged Baker Botts and Jordan, Hyden, Womble, Culbreth & Holzer to provide legal representation during the bankruptcy. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:10 am
(Holman’s Biotech IP Blog) US: Classen v. [read post]
