Search for: "Jordan v. R " Results 581 - 600 of 889
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2012, 6:39 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
By: Greta Ravitsky and Jordan Schwartz On July 24, 2012, the Fifth Circuit became the first federal appellate court in over thirty years to enforce a private settlement of a wage and hour dispute arising under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) in Martin v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 4:17 am by Adam Wagner
Othman, R (on the application of) v Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC) & Ors [2012] EWHC 2349 (Admin) – read judgment  Angus McCullough QC represented Abu Qatada as his Special Advocate in the SIAC proceedings. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 10:00 pm
Headstrong, Inc., ARB Nos. 11-008, 11-065, ALJ No. 2011-LCA-38 (ARB June 29, 2012) Final Decision and Order PDF | HTM Jordan v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 10:00 pm
Headstrong, Inc., ARB Nos. 11-008, 11-065, ALJ No. 2011-LCA-38 (ARB June 29, 2012) Final Decision and Order PDF | HTM Jordan v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 12:18 pm by Teri Rodriguez
The following reporters will be presented with an award on August 10 at the Freedom of Information Foundation of Texas annual conference in Austin: Jordan Smith, The Austin Chronicle, “The Science of Injustice” Kevin Krause and Ed Timms, The Dallas Morning News, “Bail Bondsmen: Working the Numbers” Jeff Prince, Fort Worth Weekly, “The Power of Alienation” Mandy Oaklander, Houston Press, “Life Without Parole” Andrew… [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am by Blog  Editorial
   Have an example of another individual in the same position as Mr R who has issued HC proceedings in the District of Columbia Courts. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 7:48 am by DaytonDUI
Jordan, 89 Ohio St.3d 488, 491-492, 733 N.E.2d 601 (2000). [read post]
9 May 2012, 5:40 am
She believes that the bill is an attempt to ban abortions without directly challenging the 1973 United States Supreme Court decision of Roe v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:58 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Although the panel was unanimous, the case produced three opinions — an opinion for the court by Judge Jordan and concurrences by Judges Rendell and Ambro, the latter of which expressly urges the Supreme Court to take up the case to provide further guidance on the proper interpretation of Missouri v. [read post]