Search for: "Josh" Results 581 - 600 of 14,648
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2024, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
I am happy to pass along this announcement from the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty: Becket is seeking 3 or more new attorneys for its 2024-25 Constitutional Law Fellowship. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 7:40 am by Rick Hasen
Josh Kovensky for TPM: In late 2020, a group of conservative movement attorneys set out to build a legal pathway by which Donald Trump could stay in power, having lost the election. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Josh Hawley objected that “John Podesta runs a think-tank funded by big tech, he’s spent years working for dark-money climate activists, and has said he has the ‘highest regard’ for CCP officials. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:32 am by SHG
Josh is being far too kind to Garland. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 9:58 am by Josh Blackman
[If the Court kicks the insurrection issue to the election, the Court may also kick the immunity case to the election.] [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 7:12 am
  He has been a genius in the playoffs, stopping Ravens QB and season MVP Lamar Jackson and containing the Bills all world QB Josh Allen and giving his team a chance to win both games. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 11:12 pm by Josh Blackman
[Earlier in the Constitutional Convention, the legislature had the power to appoint judges, ambassadors, and the treasurer. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 10:28 pm by Josh Blackman
[Our position is consistent with the "legal drafting culture" at the Constitutional Convention.] [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 10:01 pm by Josh Blackman
["Some more scholars" talk about Section 3] On Thursday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
2/10/1967: The 25th Amendment is ratified.The post Today in Supreme Court History: February 10, 1967 appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:40 pm by Howard Bashman
“A very un-Trumpy performance delivers for Trump at Supreme Court; Jonathan Mitchell’s argument to the justices had none of the bombast that other Trump lawyers often deploy”: Josh Gerstein of Politico has this report. [read post]