Search for: "Just v. Chambers"
Results 581 - 600
of 2,588
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2020, 2:55 am
They were in possession of 30,000 untaxed cigarettes and $63,000 in cash, and they are just the tip of the spear.[2] The inbound flow of cigarettes, not appropriately taxed by New York, is estimated to cost the state $1.2 billion. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 4:11 am
But then, how did Mark V. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 4:00 am
Guy Vassall-Adams QC is a member of Matrix Chambers, practising the field of media and information law. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:25 pm
Xavier Becerra and United States of America v. [read post]
7 Nov 2020, 3:12 am
Decisions this Week IndiaAmit Sahni v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 12:22 am
The literality of the rule led to the absurdity that any lawyer who had the slightest suspicion of unconstitutionality of a rule, would invoke it in the litigation «just in case» in the future one day a sentence would declare the unconstitutionality. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 11:53 am
London: Bradbury and Evans, 1854-1872, 25 v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 9:39 am
Matthias Zigann) granted Sharp an injunction against Daimler (which triggered a settlement, see 1, 2), as did the 21st Civil Chamber in a Conversant v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:18 am
The problem: Confusion over the definition, operation and effect of a smart contract can lead to conflict between the parties Some say “a smart contract literally contains the terms of the agreement, transformed into machine-readable scripting code,” where “the digital code is not just a representation of the agreement; it is the agreement,” and “everything beyond the code is just commentary. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 6:09 pm
In the case, Chamber of Commerce of the USA, et al. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 2:28 pm
But RNC v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 11:25 am
There is no tit for tat, there is just tat. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 11:00 am
The uptick has not just produced more rulings from the court; it’s also produced more division. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 2:15 pm
The complaint filed in California, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al. v. the Departments of Homeland Security and Labor, et al., challenges both the Strengthening Wage Protections for the Temporary and Permanent Employment of Certain Aliens in the United States Rule and the Strengthening of the H-1B Nonimmigrant Visa Classification Rule. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 6:35 am
But in that Apple v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 4:28 pm
Note that there are two more cases pending Case C-746/18 H.K. v Prokurator (Opinion handed down by AG Pitruzzella 21 Jan 2020) as well as references from Germany from 2019 and Ireland from 2020. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 7:37 am
Inherent contempt, or the authority of either chamber to punish nonmembers for obstructing its work, including for defiance of its subpoenas—upheld in early Supreme Court decisions (Anderson v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 2:32 pm
Florida, 19-7309Issue: Whether the Florida Supreme Court’s analysis of Chambers v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:52 pm
S. 1225, 1225–1226 (1969) (Harlan, J., in chambers); see also Parr v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 5:09 am
Matthias Zigann of the court's 7th Civil Chamber took perfect precautions when I attended his Sharp v. [read post]
