Search for: "Justice v. Justice"
Results 581 - 600
of 95,945
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2011, 3:25 am
Regina (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice (JUSTICE and another intervening); In re MacDermott’s and McCartney’s Applications for Judicial Review (JUSTICE intervening) [2011] UKSC 18; [2011] WLR (D) 155 “A miscarriage of justice, within the meaning of section 133 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988, occurred where a new fact so undermined the evidence against the defendant that no conviction could possibly be based upon it. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 6:00 am
Maurer notes that in one case (U.S. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 4:21 pm
The position had not been altered by the decision of the Supreme Court in A v British Broadcasting Corporation [2014] UKSC 25 (“A v BBC”). [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 6:39 pm
In Bobby v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 9:03 pm
Rust v. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 4:15 pm
V. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 9:01 pm
Chief Justice Roberts has issued his 2010 Year-End Report on the Federal Judiciary. [read post]
12 May 2014, 7:47 am
It seems likely that Chief Justice Roberts will author the much-anticipated opinion in Bond v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 7:54 am
Pena dissent to distinguish discriminatory from acceptable affirmative action policies, or, most recently, the pungent conclusion from his Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 5:00 pm
And in Texas v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 8:16 am
Justice Scalia wrote the majority opinion in County of Yakima v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
In Allen v. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 3:39 pm
In United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:08 am
Times misses the boat when it acts as if biology — and not known judicial philosophy as expressed in earlier cases — were the factor that best explains Justices’ alignments in cases like Wal-Mart v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
Justice Kavanaugh is quoting Justice Kennedy's concurrence in the judgment in Simon & Schuster v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 7:31 am
Behrend and Wal-Mart v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 1:19 pm
Ct. 1958 (2013): From Hamdi v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 10:03 am
The sole legitimate way to make those changes is through the amendment process in Article V of the Constitution.Originalism is not merely a philosophy or a theory. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 3:18 am
Millhiser, working up to a froth, asserted that there is now a “public awakening” to Alito’s radicalism, citing Alito’s dissent in Obergefell v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 6:24 pm
In the 1987 decision McClesky v. [read post]
