Search for: "Kennedy v. Louisiana"
Results 581 - 600
of 850
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2008, 12:51 pm
An interesting development in the recently decided Kennedy v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 12:28 pm
"We regret," the statement said, "that the department didn't catch the 2006 law when the case of Kennedy v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 10:21 am
A followup to my post yesterday on the origins of Linda Greenhouse's much-talked-about story on the gap in legal research in the Supreme Court's Kennedy v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 9:10 am
In what the NYT’s Linda Greenhouse is calling “a highly unusual admission of error,” the DOJ, in response to Greenhouse’s report yesterday that the Supreme Court erred in its decision in the child rape case of Kennedy v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:07 am
The DoJ Statement is as follows: We regret that the Department didn't catch the 2006 law when the case of Kennedy v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:07 am
The DoJ Statement is as follows: We regret that the Department didn't catch the 2006 law when the case of Kennedy v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 3:07 am
My co-blogger Jonathan blogs below about the fact that the briefs and opinions in Kennedy v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 1:30 am
Louisiana [Duke Law backgrounder; JURIST report]. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 12:15 am
In Kennedy v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 11:49 pm
Thursday's NYT has this piece by Linda Greenhouse following up on her article in today's NYT about Kennedy v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 8:19 pm
In today's New York Times, Linda Greenhouse reports on an oversight in Justice Anthony Kennedy's majority opinion in Kennedy v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 7:49 pm
CAAFlog, a military law blog, reports that both the majority and dissenting SCOTUS justices in Kennedy v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 7:47 pm
In Kennedy v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 7:02 pm
" Erin Sheley has an essay entitled "Dead Men Walking: Why Kennedy v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 5:08 pm
In today's New York Times, Linda Greenhouse points out what appears to be a factual error in the Kennedy v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 2:51 pm
In deciding Kennedy v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 2:35 pm
The AMK clerk who worked on Kennedy v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 2:07 pm
In turns out that Justice Kennedy's opinion in Kennedy v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 12:10 pm
But on today's front page, barely two weeks before her retirement, Greenhouse nails a good story thanks to that familial connection.Over the weekend, Greenhouse says in an e-mail, her husband, Eugene Fidell, spotted a blog post that claimed the Supreme Court's majority decision in Kennedy v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 9:29 am
Check out the New York Times' coverage of CAAFlog's earlier post describing the error in the Kennedy v. [read post]
