Search for: "Kent Scheidegger"
Results 581 - 600
of 624
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2007, 9:53 pm
Intriguingly, it appears that death penalty supporter Kent Scheidegger has now begrudgingly accepted the de facto moratorium label. [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 12:42 pm
Intriguingly, it appears that death penalty supporter Kent Scheidegger has now begrudgingly accepted the de facto moratorium label. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 7:44 am
Kent Scheidegger, legal director for the pro-death penalty Criminal Justice Legal Foundation immediately fretted that any moratorium, de facto or otherwise, would dilute deterrence and "cause more innocent people to die".It is, of course, beyond the realms of ridiculous to think that criminals who have until now been reining in their murderous impulses, will have read the court's ruling and, with a sigh of relief, decided they can now go on killing sprees. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 6:44 am
Kent Scheidegger, legal director and general counsel for the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, which favors capital punishment and opposes expansion of criminal rights, said he had hoped the court would explain its reasoning in its case-by-case review of the stay requests. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 4:51 am
Kent Scheidegger at Crime & Consequences has this notable reaction: "There is substantial reason to believe that moratoriums kill innocent people. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 5:26 am
Thanks to this post by Kent Scheidegger at Crime & Consequences, entitled "Cunningham, Chili, & Fingers," everyone can catch up with various post-Cunningham issues playing out in California court by reading about the sentencing appeal of Anna Ayala, the woman who infamously tried to defraud Wendy's by putting a human finger in her own chili. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 7:17 pm
At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger had some very interesting policy arguments to make:Along with the constitutional problems, civil commitment is a problem because it takes another step down a road we have already traveled too far -- the medicalization of crime. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 8:05 am
"These cases are being reconsidered in a lot more detail than they need to be," says Kent Scheidegger, legal director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, a victims' rights group based in California. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 2:35 pm
" As Kent Scheidegger noted in his comments to Lyle's earlier post, Rule 37.6 has been revised to require that a merits amicus brief be filed "within 7 days after the brief for the party supported is filed, or if in support of neither party, within 7 days after the time allowed for filing the petitioner's or appellant's brief. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 12:25 pm
Kent Scheidegger, legal director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, a Sacramento, Calif. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 4:32 pm
At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger has these comments on the end of the Term and reversal rates for federal circuits. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 11:40 am
Orin Kerr has this initial post and these thoughts on the Court's new habeas exception at Volokh Conspiracy; Kent Scheidegger of Crime & Consequences weighs in here. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 1:36 pm
Here are some early reactions to the Rita decision from sites on my blogroll: Lyle Denniston here at SCOTUSblog Mark Osler here at SCOTUSblog Steve Kalar here on the Ninth Circuit Blog Orin Kerr here at the Volokh Conspiracy Peter Henning here on the White Collar Crime Prof Blog Kent Scheidegger here on Crime and Consequences Feel free to comment on the commentary or to note other good blog analysis in the comments. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 9:45 am
Kent Scheidegger weighs in here at Crime & Consequences. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 1:50 pm
Kent Scheidegger of Crime & Consequences has this post on the Brendlin decision and two cert. denials in capital cases; at Sentencing Law & Policy, Doug Berman weighs in here on today's action. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 1:45 pm
Russell dismissing a convicted murderer's appeal because he missed the filing deadline even though a district court judge mistakenly noted a later deadline; Kent Scheidegger of Crime & Consequences weighs in here. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 1:05 am
"I hear the pain in their voices as they get frustrated with the system," Scheidegger said. [read post]
21 May 2007, 10:26 am
Here, at Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger discusses the Supreme Court's dismissal of Roper v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 5:10 pm
Here, at Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger has a post about today's decision in Landrigan. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 4:54 pm
I still haven't yet had a chance to read all the SCOTUS death decisions today, but I notice that many thoughtful bloggers are all over these cases: Kent Scheidegger at Crime & Consequences discusses all the cases here and here. [read post]
