Search for: "LAWS v. DAVIS" Results 581 - 600 of 6,228
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2009, 10:46 am by K&L Gates
Davis New York Law Journal November 5, 2009 There are now several decisions determining whether employees can retain attorney-client privilege for e-mails sent to their lawyers using their employer-provided e-mail addresses and computers -- reaching apparently inconsistent conclusions. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
Tsai (Boston University - School of Law) & Mary Ziegler (University of California, Davis - School of Law) have posted Abortion Politics and the Rise of Movement Jurists (UC Davis Law Review, Vol. 57, 2024) on SSRN. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 10:00 am by Joe Davis and Nick Reaves
Joe Davis and Nick Reaves are Counsel at the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, which filed an amicus brief in support of neither party in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 11:44 am
You may perhaps recall Marks from your old law school days. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
Nila Bala (University of California, Davis - School of Law) has posted Parent-Child Privilege as Resistance (Boston College Law Review, Forthcoming Nov. 2024) on SSRN. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 8:24 am by The Owens Law Firm, P.L.L.C.
Later this week, the Texas Law continues with the Confrontation Clause theme and returns to the hallowed halls of the United States Supreme Court to investigate Davis v. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On Tuesday and Wednesday 13 and 14 November 2018, the Supreme Court (Lords Kerr, Wilson, Sumption, Hodge and Briggs) will hear the appeal in Lachaux (Respondent) v Independent Print Limited and another (Appellants) UKSC 2017/0175, against the Court of Appeal decision of Davis LJ, with whom MacFarlane and Sharp LJJ concurred ([2017] EWCA Civ 1334). [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 4:22 am by Oscar Davies and Jack Castle
Oscar Davies, a barrister at Lamb Chambers, and Jack Castle, a barrister at Henderson Chambers, offer their views on the Elan-Cane decision (R (On the application of Elan-Cane) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) [2021] UKSC 56) in this piece that first appeared in the New Law Journal. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Davis, (ED KY, filed 7/1/2016)) alleges in part:The Plaintiff seek one of two forms of relief: (1) that the state be enjoined from enforcing any laws and policies that prevents him from legally marrying an inanimate object in light of the decision in Obergefell v. [read post]