Search for: "LONG v. PARKER" Results 581 - 600 of 667
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2022, 7:07 am by Clara Apt
by Lucía Falcón Palomar (@LuciaFalconP), Obinna Maduka and JoAnn Kamuf Ward (@JoAnnKWard) (April 8, 2021) COVID-19, California’s Wildfires, and Reimagining “The Reserves” by Jordan Beauregard (September 25, 2020) Humanitarianism … [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 7:13 am by admin
Sibelius), some achieve moment (Miranda v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am by admin
”9 History seems to be on the majority’s side, as one struggles to find a Supreme Court case that struck down a condemnation—either state or federal, so long as 2 the agency had a mere rational basis for its decision to condemn. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
A site can be protected under the OPEN Act even if it directly infringes and directly profits off infringement, so long as it “expeditiously” removes material when it is notified. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: Australian Review of National Innovation System released: (IPRoo), (Mallesons Stephen Jaques), (creativecommons.org), (IP Menu News), Senate Committee on the Judiciary approval of Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Act 2008 and surrounding debate (Law360), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica), (Wired), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica),… [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 3:11 pm by Giles Peaker
Cant v London Borough of Hackney LON/00AM/LSC/2016/0231 I’m not going to go into the actual service charge issues in any depth. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:07 pm
If taxpayers are to buy illiquid and opaque assets from troubled sellers, the terms, occasions, and methods of such purchases must be crystal clear ahead of time and carefully monitored afterwards. 3) Its long-term effects. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
Cross-posted on the Law Theories blog. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 10:39 am by Adam White
Parker) skewered Bickel in a 1971 Harvard Law Review commentary on The Supreme Court [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 1:47 pm by Howard Knopf
How long should it take to approve a consent agreement submitted by sophisticated parties after a seven year struggle? [read post]