Search for: "Land Holding, LLC" Results 581 - 600 of 1,497
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2007, 4:33 am
Broadbent Land & Resources, LLC Citation: 2007 WY 87 Docket Number: 05-277 Appeal from the District Court of Uinta County, the Honorable Dennis L. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Pending before the Court are motions for summary judgment in lieu of complaint, made pursuant to CPLR 3213, in two separate collection actions brought against defendants Preserve Associates, LLC and Tupper Lake Preserve LLC. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:01 am by SHG
As my almost-adopted son, Cristian Farias, twitted: Chevron: Law of the land for more than 30 years. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 4:29 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The Company operated on six adjacent parcels of real estate in East Setauket, New York, five of which Joseph and his second wife, Laura, acquired over a period of decades through two real estate holding companies, NIMT Enterprises, LLC (“NIMT”) and L.J.T. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 2:57 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  This is a result of the doctrine of res judicata (or claim preclusion), and a textbook example of that doctrine’s application in the CEQA litigation context can be found in the Third District’s recent partially published opinion in Ione Valley Land, Air, and Water Defense Alliance, LLC v. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
 Section 2 (a) protects the freedom of individuals and groups to hold and manifest religious beliefs. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 5:01 am by SHG
” Without qualification, whatever a majority of the Supreme Court holds is itself the “supreme law of the land. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 11:50 am by Cyrus E. Phillips IV
The Federal Circuit has resolved a quandary about the implied-in-fact contract theory of protest jurisdiction, this in Resource Conservation Group, LLC v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 9:45 am by wadminw
Sometimes, it’s even much better than going to a land-based casino. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 10:35 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Most of the Court’s changes were minor and technical in nature, pertaining more to issues of concern to the parties on remand, rather than its major precedential holdings, but a few were noteworthy. [read post]