Search for: "Leisure v. Leisure" Results 581 - 600 of 676
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm by Mihir Rai
Maclean and Pabilonia also found that leisure and sleep time increased, primarily for men living with school-aged children. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 9:47 pm by Simon Gibbs
In Crane v Canons Leisure Centre [2007] EWCA Civ 1352 the Court was concerned with whether work undertaken by independent costs draftsmen (referred to in the judgment as costs consultants and apparently not members of the ALCD) could be treated as part of the instructing solicitors’ profit costs such as to attract a success fee. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 12:41 pm
It is  hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 2:16 am
On Wednesday this Kat reported on the latest intellectual property-flavoured dispute to be referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling, Case C-657/11 Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology (BEST) v Bert Peelaers and Visys NV. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 6:19 am by Richard Hunt
More important, all my options are there on the screen in front of me and I can make my choices at my leisure and change them before I check out. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
You cannot depend for literary instruction and amusement on the leisure of men occupied in the pursuits of active life. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 3:59 pm
Is Amartya Sen “the century’s great critic of capitalism”? [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 6:22 am
In its controversial ruling in Case C-530/12, OHIM v National Lottery Commission [extensively reported by the IPKat here],the focus was on the probative value of national law: does it need to be considered by OHIM and by the General Court as a matter of fact or as a matter of law? [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:09 pm by Leslie Sammis
" All persons entitled to notice of the leisure of the property, as defined in s. 932.701(2)(e), F. [read post]