Search for: "Leisure v. Leisure" Results 581 - 600 of 676
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2009, 6:58 pm
As some may know the judge, pursuant to Allen v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 3:13 am
The decision in Crane v Canons Leisure Centre [2007] EWCA Civ 1352 may need to be reversed.All these proposals are designed to reduce costs disputes and reduce the cost of costs disputes. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 12:55 pm
  The employees (naturally) alleged that this was an overly restrictive policy and they unable to enjoy any leisure activities or engage in their own pursuits. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:00 am
: Patent bar, doctors face off in Prometheus v Mayo (The Prior Art)   US Copyright Rights owners taking on small victims – Warner Music vs ‘Keyboard Cat’ YouTube clip; DC Comics vs John Stacks over figurines; Frank Gaylord vs postal service over art image on stamps (1709 Copyright Blog)   US Copyright – Decisions District Court Colorado: Republishing third party rankings in marketing material might be copyright/trade mark… [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 7:13 am
Given that at least two of those cases remain subject to ongoing appeal proceedings (Fisher v Brooker, the "Whiter Shade of Pale" case, is awaiting judgement in the House of Lords and Football Association Premier League Limited and others v QC Leisure, the case concerning smartcards for foreign satellite transmissions, is pending before the European Court of Justice), another edition very soon will doubtless be justified. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 2:23 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) DA (Colombia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWCA Civ 682 (13 July 2009) Bourne Leisure Ltd (t/a British Holidays) v Marsden [2009] EWCA Civ 671 (13 July 2009) Highland Crusader Offshore Partners LP & Ors v Deutsche Bank AG & Anor [2009] EWCA Civ 725 (13 July 2009) Court of [...] [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 7:25 pm
The appeal decision can be viewed here:   Mont Adventure Equipment Pty Ltd v Phoenix Leisure Group Pty Ltd [2009] FCAFC 84 (7 July 2009). [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 5:15 pm
Mont Adventure Equipment Pty Ltd v Phoenix Leisure Group Pty Ltd [2009] FCAFC 84 ps: IPTA was granted leave to intervene (and while advocating the view that the Full Court adopted, was ordered to pay any additional costs incurred by the parties as a result of the intervention). pps:a patentee who needs to rely on a grace period to preserve the validity of the patent in Australia may well still lose the patent outside Australia where the grace period does not apply ');… [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 7:30 am by Thomas Swartz
  An interesting case involving assumption of risk and injuries sustained by a road cyclist was decided on May 19th by the Second Department  - Cotty v Town of Southampton, 2009 NY Slip Op 04020.The plaintiff was a member of a bicycle club which engaged in long-distance rides. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 7:30 am by Thomas Swartz
  An interesting case involving assumption of risk and injuries sustained by a road cyclist was decided on May 19th by the Second Department  - Cotty v Town of Southampton, 2009 NY Slip Op 04020.The plaintiff was a member of a bicycle club which engaged in long-distance rides. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 7:30 am by Thomas Swartz
  An interesting case involving assumption of risk and injuries sustained by a road cyclist was decided on May 19th by the Second Department  - Cotty v Town of Southampton, 2009 NY Slip Op 04020.The plaintiff was a member of a bicycle club which engaged in long-distance rides. [read post]