Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 581 - 600
of 21,031
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2021, 12:58 pm
To be actionable, however, the inference urged by the plaintiff must be a reasonable one; if the judge has to squint her eyes and stretch her imagination to interpret the defendant’s statement the way the plaintiff is interpreting it, she will likely dismiss the case at the outset. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 3:00 am
District Judge in New Jersey has ruled that an insurer who does not issue, but merely services, a policy of insurance, may be held liable for bad faith conduct. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 1:12 pm
The teenager had been drinking alcohol provided by the defendant at the defendant’s house the prior evening. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 7:11 am
A federal court last week became the latest to refuse to hold a defendant liable for injuries allegedly caused by asbestos-containing parts manufactured by others but used with the defendant's products. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 4:20 am
Would this sufficiently attenuate the defendant’s acts from the resulting death? [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 6:16 am
The motion to dismiss also held in the alternative that Victory did not owe her any duty: the “defendant’s duty to provide a safe workplace to its employees does not extend to nonemployees. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 6:07 am
")….The post Plaintiff Sues Defendant, Alleging Defendant's "Niche Is Cancel Culture" appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 4:27 am
The Court of Appeals rejected these arguments, finding that the president’s “personal knowledge of who [defendant] employed could be reasonably inferred based on his position as president of the company. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 6:59 am
” The Court noted that plaintiff’s own evidence showed that “the loose piece of wood was not visibly open and obvious,” and that “the evidence demonstrate[d] that Plaintiff had no knowledge of the dangerous condition, but neither did Defendants…” Essentially, plaintiff’s evidence regarding his own lack of knowledge of the dangerous condition also showed that defendants had no reason to be aware of the potentially… [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:04 am
The case proceeded to trial, but after the plaintiffs rested, the judge granted the defendant's motion for a partial directed verdict on the issue of informed consent. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:04 am
The case proceeded to trial, but after the plaintiffs rested, the judge granted the defendant's motion for a partial directed verdict on the issue of informed consent. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 4:25 pm
Historically, if a Georgia court found multiple defendants liable for an accident, all of the defendants could be held collectively responsible for any monetary judgment. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 7:54 am
The person sitting in the driver’s seat? [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 7:54 am
The person sitting in the driver’s seat? [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 3:00 am
The Eleventh Circuit noted that the Senate Judiciary Committee’s report on CAFA contained the statements that suggest that the “primary defendants” be interpreted to reach those defendants who are the real “targets” of the lawsuit—i.e., the defendants that would be expected to incur most of the loss if found liable. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 11:40 am
In granting Defendant’s summary judgment motion, the trial court rejected the plaintiff’s arguments and dismissed the case. [read post]
When Can a Franchisor Be Liable for Overtime and Minimum Wage Violations at a Franchisee’s Business?
15 Jul 2014, 11:39 am
After the Entjers settled, Orozco added Craig Plackis as a defendant alleging that the franchisor was also his employer. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 12:59 pm
In order to establish negligence, you must show that the defendant owed you a duty of care, the defendant breached that duty of care, the defendant’s breach was a direct cause of your harm, and you suffered damages. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 3:20 pm
The Issue: Are the co-defendants liable to plaintiff? [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 12:00 am
To the first prong, there was no question Luxottica and Oakley’s trademarks were counterfeited. [read post]
