Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 581 - 600 of 21,037
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2023, 9:00 am by ricelawmd_3p2zve
  The core cause of the accident here is the other driver’s violations or unsafe driving, and they should be held liable for any and all injuries that result, even if they were only made possible because of the victim’s preexisting conditions. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:10 am by Burton A. Padove
Under the respondeat superior theory, a company can be liable for its drivers’ negligence when the driver is operating the employer’s truck on a scheduled delivery route at a scheduled time in some manner as to further the employer’s business. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:00 am by ricelawmd_3p2zve
However, depending on the defendants financial resources, they may not be able to pay all of your expenses right away. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 7:00 am by ricelawmd_3p2zve
Conversely, if the defendants case is rock-solid, it may be advisable to accept a settlement offer. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 7:00 am by Petrelli Previtera, LLC
For those potentially liable for alimony payments, understanding your options and legal rights is crucial. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:44 pm by Earl Drott
As a result, the trial court’s decision to grant summary judgment in favor of the defendant was affirmed, and the plaintiff’s lawsuit was dismissed. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 12:26 pm by Brian
The Provider’s Negligence Caused the Injury It’s not sufficient to prove negligence alone; it must be shown that the provider’s negligence directly caused the patient’s injury. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 12:26 pm by Brian
The Provider’s Negligence Caused the Injury It’s not sufficient to prove negligence alone; it must be shown that the provider’s negligence directly caused the patient’s injury. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 12:26 pm by Brian
The Provider’s Negligence Caused the Injury It’s not sufficient to prove negligence alone; it must be shown that the provider’s negligence directly caused the patient’s injury. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 11:20 am by Chris Skelton
Many states apply a progressive tax rate, which means that the rate depends on the taxpayer’s income. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 9:00 am by ricelawmd_3p2zve
For you, it very well may be that the process will be the same; you are still trying to prove that the defendant(s) are liable. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 10:00 pm
When the Kings County Supreme Court granted that request, C.M. appealed.The Appellate Division, Second Department, noted that when these kinds of motions are made, it’s incumbent upon the movant to show that “`the defendant breached a duty owed to the plaintiff and that the defendant's negligence was a proximate cause of the alleged injuries.'”Since it was unrebutted that K.F. had the right of way, and that C.M. failed to yield before… [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 10:27 am by Jason Rantanen
  There’s an argument that those policies must be disclosed on any remand, though docket searches suggest that’s not happening. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 10:24 am by Swor & Gatto
However, they can bring an action against a third party liable for the employee’s injury. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 7:00 am by ricelawmd_3p2zve
Additionally, leaving a potentially liable defendant out of the lawsuit may make it so that the other defendants can claim you are targeting them, which may be detrimental to your case. [read post]
25 Nov 2023, 9:26 am by Mavrick Law Firm
  Third parties try sometimes claim they cannot be liable for their statements to fraud victims, claiming they made no statement of fact, but instead merely gave their opinion. [read post]
25 Nov 2023, 1:38 am by David Adelstein
If [the] claims against the non-signatory Defendants were stayed in this Court, while claims against [subcontractor] proceeded in [the different forum], that court would determine the amount [subcontractor] owes to [sub-subcontractor], but then non-signatory Defendants may ultimately be held liable to [sub-subcontractor] for repayment of that amount under the Miller Act in this Court. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 6:25 pm by Texas Legal News
" Sometimes, the defendant's acts set off a chain reaction that is too out of the ordinary to hold the defendant guilty. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 12:21 pm by zola.support.team
This means that the accident would not have occurred if not for the defendants actions or inaction. [read post]