Search for: "Livings v. Davis" Results 581 - 600 of 1,225
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2015, 3:28 pm by Danny O'Brien
Related Issues: Free SpeechInternationalRelated Cases: Kazakhstan v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In that way, the plan would ensure that every voter—regardless of the state in which she lives—would have her vote count equally to that of every other voter in the country. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 3:53 am by INFORRM
Reading its decision after having read the Davis judgment of the English High Court, one wonders whether legal syllogism has suddenly been replaced by useless tautology. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 2:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  CTRL-C and CTRL-V are considered sacred symbols. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 4:40 pm by Steve Kalar
Judge Nguyen concludes that Hernandez’s DMV assertions were functionally identical to live, in-court testimony and were therefore testimonial. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 6:31 am by JB
The Court allowed a similar arrangement in Davis v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
For example, if New Hampshire changed its motto from the traditional “Live Free or Die” message that has been appearing on its license plates for decades (and that was the subject of the other famous Supreme Court case involving a license plate, Wooley v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 4:10 am
PatLit features a guest post from Richard Kempner, Brian Whitehead and Stuart Jackson on the brace of recent Court of Appeals patent decisions (ConvaTec and Actavis v Lilly) which are currently preoccupying those good souls who spend their lives seeking to extract meaning from patent claims and descriptions. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 5:53 am by SHG
As noted in the New York Times’ editorial, Justice Anthony Kennedy seized the opportunity to write a concurring opinion in Davis v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:48 am by MBettman
That future development came in a pair of domestic violence cases decided the same day,  Davis v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 6:08 am
Parke, Davis & Co., 297 N.W.2d 252, 258 (Minn. 1980); Dadd v. [read post]