Search for: "Long v. District Court" Results 581 - 600 of 22,399
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2014, 6:49 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Riverside County, et al, 5:14-cv-00007-DMG-DBT (United States District Court, Central District of California). [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 10:45 am by David Greene
Today we asked the appeals court to apply that same reasoning to Jewel v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 4:31 am
Ct. 1955 (U.S. 2007), a solid 7-2 majority (per Souter, J.) of the Court said some things about federal pleading that it (and we) recognized were long overdue.Basically, federal courts (and we hope state courts with rules that track the federal rules) should no longer allow pleadings to become the almost fact-free zones that pre-Twombly practice has permitted. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 1:00 pm by Zach ZhenHe Tan
The first, also in the Ninth Circuit, is the long-running Doe v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 7:05 am by Sheppard Mullin
Major A recent decision by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas may have caused grave damage to protections long available to overseas government contractors and their employees under the Defense Base Act (“DBA”), 42 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 3:22 pm by Sheppard Mullin
The numerous amicus briefs filed at the district court level will undoubtedly increase at the appellate level. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 11:31 pm
Among the projects funded were nine by churches.Focusing particularly on the Supreme Court's 2000 decision in Mitchell v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 9:52 am by Jane Chong
Obama, affirming the district court’s denial of Abdullah’s motion to enjoin the U.S. government from detaining him. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 8:00 pm by Howard Friedman
 At issue is whether a district court’s decision to quash or enforce an EEOC subpoena should be reviewed de novo, or whether an appellate court should instead give more deference to the district court's decision. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 7:42 am by Woodrow Pollack
My colleague Jeffrey Kuntz has additional information here.Internet Solutions Corp. v. [read post]