Search for: "M. B.1." Results 581 - 600 of 13,684
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2021, 10:43 am
  With the hope and expectation that Judge Watford and those of his ilk won't have enough votes to take the case en banc for conflicting with prior circuit precedent.Maybe I'm wrong. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 3:30 am
Two in the same opinion, I’m thrilled. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 5:23 am by Nexsen Pruet
*Rule 4 is amended to replace references to Civil Procedure Rule 58(a)(1) with references to Rule 58(a).(2) Amicus Disclosure Rules Let's suppose you are not satisfied with the 14,000-word limit for a principal brief (Rule 32(a)(7)(B)) and you either don't want to ask for extra pages or your request has been denied. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 12:10 pm by Lawrence Solum
This chapter begins by briefly recounting the drafting history of both Article 27(1) of the UDHR and Article 15(1)(b) of the ICESCR. [read post]
1 Jun 2013, 2:57 am by Rechtsanwalt
Neben der Bestechung in einem besonders schweren Fall gemäß §§ 334 Abs. 1 S. 1 Var. 1, 335 Abs. 1 lit. b StGB wird ihm auch Anstiftung zur Untreue gemäß §§ 266 Abs. 1, 26 StGB vorgeworfen. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 8:44 am
"  (15 USC 7707(b)(1) & (2).) [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 6:55 am by Joel R. Brandes
Subdivision M. titled “NOTICE OF GUIDELINE MAINTENANCE” contains a notice intended to comply with DRL §236 [B] [6] [g],  in cases where there is an unrepresented party. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 6:26 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
So much so that they have become in some quarters such a questionable marketing practice that the Law Society of Ontario has special commentary for them under the Rules of Professional Conduct, 4.2-1 A lawyer may market legal services only if the marketing (a) is demonstrably true, accurate and verifiable; (b) is neither misleading, confusing, or deceptive, nor likely to mislead, confuse or deceive; and (c) is in the best interests of the public and is consistent with a… [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:08 pm
A Segunda Turma do Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) decidiu nesta terça-feira (2) que os dirigentes da empresa Vichi Equipamentos de Proteção Ltda. continuarão a responder a uma ação penal instaurada para apurar a suposta prática do crime de peculato, na forma do parágrafo 1º do artigo 312 do Código Penal, em desfavor da Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo (Sabesp). [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Lund, Church Autonomy in the United States, (in Freedom of Religion and Religious Pluralism (Md Jahid Hossain Bhuiyan & Carla M. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 3:23 am by Claudia Posluschny and Stefanie Radina
Die Rechtsfrage betrifft auch die Verfahren 6 AZR 155/21 (B) und 6 AZR 121/22 (B), die deshalb ebenfalls ausgesetzt wurden. [read post]