Search for: "MARKS v. STATE"
Results 581 - 600
of 21,509
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2012, 10:57 pm
Buccellati v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 3:29 am
LLC v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 7:26 am
It urged that restriction under Section 18 is permitted only when the description of the mark in the registration is "ambiguous or overly broad," citing Wellcome Foundation Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:04 am
Iancu v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 6:19 am
The Court states that in this dual system of trade marks, the registration of national trade marks is solely a matter for the Member States and that, therefore, OHIM and the General Court are not competent for either the registration or the declaration of invalidity of those trade marks. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 1:33 am
As stated stated in this post, the New York Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in People v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 10:49 am
So, provided that absolute and relative grounds serve different purposes -– the protection of (i) a general interest and of (ii) the individual trade mark holder -- the AG stated that the relevant public has only one overall impression of the mark -- but that, for absolute grounds of refusal of registration the focus is on possible connections between the mark or its components and the goods and services covered while, for relative grounds, the focus… [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 8:23 pm
United States – with which all other justices in Freeman expressly disagreed – on the theory that it is the “narrowest grounds” of a plurality opinion under Marks v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 4:42 pm
Price v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 10:03 am
Germany, Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom and Kennedy v. the United Kingdom. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 9:13 pm
v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 3:30 pm
Trade Mark DilutionUS federal and New York state law allow Tiffany, as an owner of a famous mark, to stop a person from using the Tiffany mark in commerce in a way that is likely to cause dilution by blurring or dilution by tarnishment of the mark. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 1:06 pm
The defendant relied on State v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 11:49 am
"Court takes up case on eyewitness identification," is Mark Sherman's initial AP report on oral arguments in the case of Perry v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 1:35 pm
United States, or its decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 11:00 am
Currently, any individual may bring a claim on behalf of the United States for false patent marking. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 9:30 pm
The high court’s decision in Barron v. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 7:05 am
"A call for separation of school and state": Today in The Boston Globe, columnist Jeff Jacoby has an op-ed that begins, "Whatever else might be said about it, US District Judge Mark Wolf's decision in Parker v. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 1:31 pm
Power Co. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 3:43 pm
To discuss the case, we have Mark H. [read post]
