Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 581 - 600 of 20,058
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Therefore, the subject-matter of claim 1 according to the first auxiliary request is entitled to the priority of document D0 (A 87(1)(b)). [read post]
28 May 2019, 3:45 am by Jessica Kroeze
(b) The sole independent claim 1 of the fifth auxiliary request was novel over D1, D9, D10 and D18 and involved an inventive step over D2 as closest prior art.IV. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 7:28 am by Docket Navigator
AT&T Mobility, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility et al, 2-16-cv-01374 (TXED July 15, 2017, Order) (Payne, MJ) [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 8:28 am by Matt Osenga
  In addressing this issue, the Court recognized that there may be some overlap between § 101 and § 102, but this won’t always be the case. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:24 am by Jim Pravel
See, e.g., State Street, 149 F. 3d, at 1373; AT&T Corp., 172 F. 3d, at 1357. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 1:36 am
The EPO, in particular its Boards and Enlarged Board of Appeal, is currently greatly exercised on matters of vegetation. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 5:00 am by Samuel Hagreen
 In the Lockheed transaction, Todd and Manza allegedly kept information from their internal auditors because Manza said “they wouldn’t go for it. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 4:38 am by William Carleton
So the question of whether or not you can attract investors matters. [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 3:17 am by Old Fox
Click here to register your InterestContributorBrewster B. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
If you read the whole story, you will find interesting things on T 352/04 and on the requirements of R 80. [read post]
26 May 2007, 10:56 am
[T]his appeal address[es] whether sexually explicit reading material is admissible under Rule 404(b). [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 1:52 pm by Larry
To survive a motion to dismiss under CIT Rule 12(b)(6), the complaint must contain sufficient factual matter to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 10:24 am by KC Johnson
The professor liked Student A, and didn’t particularly like Students B or C. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 1:05 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
One type is granting protection to matter that hasn’t earned protection—doesn’t actually function as a mark; aren’t used in a TM way. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In such a situation the introduction of this ground for opposition can result from the fact that the reasons for the decision contain substantiated statements regarding that matter.[2.4] In point 3.3 of its decision the OD refers, in an unambiguous and sufficient way, to the legal and factual framework of the ground for opposition according to which the skilled person can “can carry out” (thereby implicitly mentioning [the German version of] A 100(b)) a waterstop device… [read post]