Search for: "MATTER OF M J S" Results 581 - 600 of 4,908
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Today’s case of the day, Kriegman v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 10:56 am by Yosi Yahoudai
Companies have an outside auditor, no matter how good they think the CEO is. [read post]
21 Apr 2018, 12:41 pm
Plea agreement: Waiver: Appeal (direct): Constitutional claims: Harlan, J.: Ames, J. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 8:13 am by WSLL
Sherwood.Representing Appellee (Plaintiff/Defendant): Aaron J. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 10:48 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: IN THE MATTER OF THE WORKER’S COMPENSATION CLAIM OF: MARTY D. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 6:30 am
Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, on Friday, December 1, 2023 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of November 24-30, 2023 US Public Company Board Diversity in 2023: How Corporate Director Diversity Can Contribute to Board Effectiveness Posted by Merel Spierings, The Conference Board, on Friday, November 24, 2023 Tags: board diversity, directors, Diversity, Public Companies … [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 6:30 am
Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, on Friday, December 1, 2023 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of November 24-30, 2023 US Public Company Board Diversity in 2023: How Corporate Director Diversity Can Contribute to Board Effectiveness Posted by Merel Spierings, The Conference Board, on Friday, November 24, 2023 Tags: board diversity, directors, Diversity, Public Companies … [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 9:14 pm
It was a classic City Editor sort of thing, the kind of look you'd expect from J. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 7:46 pm
Evans, 536 U.S. 452, 492 (2002) (Thomas, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part; joined in relevant part by Kennedy, J.); DOC v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 1:40 pm
Matter of J-H-J-, 26 I&N Dec. 563 (BIA 2015); The Board held that only aliens who originally entered the United States as lawful permanent residents (with an immigrant visa) are barred from INA § 212(h) relief for a prior aggravated felony conviction. [read post]