Search for: "MATTER OF POWERS v. Powers" Results 581 - 600 of 21,813
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NY3d 471and other decisions, the Appellate Division explained that judicial review of arbitration awards is extremely limited, and an arbitration award may be vacated by a court only in the event "an arbitrator exceeds his or her power" and arbitrators exceed their power only in the event the award issued "violates a strong public policy, is irrational, or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated… [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NY3d 471and other decisions, the Appellate Division explained that judicial review of arbitration awards is extremely limited, and an arbitration award may be vacated by a court only in the event "an arbitrator exceeds his or her power" and arbitrators exceed their power only in the event the award issued "violates a strong public policy, is irrational, or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated… [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 6:02 am by Derek T. Muller
The context matters, and the context here—again, while extraordinary—is narrow. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 6:30 am by Richard Primus
  Schwartz reads the modern Court from Wickard to Gonzales v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 4:43 am by Steve Vladeck
Circuit denied rehearing en banc in Kiyemba II.Why does this all matter? [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 10:38 pm by Mary L. Dudziak
New York, invalidated a similar New York law allegedly justified by the police power, explaining that "no definition of [the police power], and no urgency for its use, can authorize a State to exercise it in regard to a subject-matter which has been confided exclusively to the discretion of Congress by the Constitution. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:55 am by INFORRM
That was a matter determined by the common law and the Defamation Acts. [read post]
5 Sep 2010, 9:50 pm by Edward X. Clinton, Jr.
In April 2008, the Court granted Indianapolis Power & Light's Motion for Summary Judgment and the case was dismissed. [read post]