Search for: "MITCHELL v. STATE" Results 581 - 600 of 2,023
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2018, 4:25 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Provencio  (Uranium Mining; Public Lands)Mitchell v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 2:00 am by Paul Caron
Reuven Avi-Yonah (Michigan), Lily Batchelder (NYU), Joshua Blank (UC-Irvine), Noel Cunningham (NYU), Victor Fleischer (UC-Irvine), Ari Glogower (Ohio State), David Kamin (NYU), Mitchell Kane (NYU), Michael Knoll (Penn), Rebecca Kysar (Fordham), Leandra Lederman (Indiana), Zachary Liscow (Yale), Ruth Mason (Virginia), Susan Morse (Texas), Daniel Shaviro (NYU), Stephen Shay (Harvard), John... [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
At The Atlantic, Natasha Bertrand observes that a “key Republican senator has quietly weighed in on an upcoming Supreme Court case” – Gamble v. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
In a video on his eponymous blog, Ross Runkel looks at Mount Lemmon Fire District v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
At Medium, Katy Naples-Mitchell urges the justices to review Johnson v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 9:30 pm by Ronald M. Levin
Supreme Court’s recent travel ban case, Trump v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 2:27 am by INFORRM
Canada The Times Colonist reports that the Supreme Court of Canada has refused permission to appeal in the case of Nazerali v Mitchell in which the judge had awarded damages of $1,2 million (2016 BCSC 810) thus bringing to an end a 7 year legal battle. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 2:12 am by Florian Mueller
Qualcomm, there's also a short but interesting ruling that United States Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 4:53 am by SHG
In The Writ-of-Erasure Fallacy, Mitchell states what should be an obvious fact: But the federal judiciary has no authority to alter or annul a statute. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 2:30 am by Lyle Denniston
  In December 1970, the Court split 5-to-4 in the case of Oregon v. [read post]