Search for: "Maine v. Superior Court" Results 581 - 600 of 1,005
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
Second, from a prosecutorial discretionary policy perspective, sometimes various allegations such as the over breadth of a section of the Criminal Code are dismissed as relatively unimportant in the real world.[19]  One of the main arguments that is used for dismissing these allegations in Canada is the claim that it is hoped that prosecutorial discretion will prevent enforcement of Statutes and Legislation in circumstances in which liability would be unwarranted.[20] For example, in… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
Second, from a prosecutorial discretionary policy perspective, sometimes various allegations such as the over breadth of a section of the Criminal Code are dismissed as relatively unimportant in the real world.[19]  One of the main arguments that is used for dismissing these allegations in Canada is the claim that it is hoped that prosecutorial discretion will prevent enforcement of Statutes and Legislation in circumstances in which liability would be unwarranted.[20] For example, in… [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:34 am
The Ontario Court of Justice acquitted Castonguay, but that decision was reversed by the Superior Court. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 3:34 am by Peter Mahler
” (Read here and here excerpts from Mizrahi’s main and reply briefs, and here and here my posts on the trial and appellate court rulings in Superior Vending.) [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 11:44 am
  But, the Court highlighted that the main contract governing the claims in litigation did not. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:23 pm by Moderator
  If the Law nor the corporate charter of [the corporation] prohibited [the legal representative] to participate in the shareholder meeting of [another corporation] as proxy of [the corporation], the Court does not see a reason to annul the results of said meeting. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 3:28 pm by Employment Lawyers
Brobston, Pennsylvania's Superior Court (the appeal court one step below the PA Supreme Court), the Court considered whether the employer could enforce a non-compete agreement against an employee it had terminated due to alleged poor performance. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 8:49 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Supreme Court in Cloutier v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Not only was this incorrect instruction flipping the burden of proof given, which was bad enough, but it was given in splendid isolation – “after the trial court’s main charge to the jury and . [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 2:15 pm by Luke Rioux
State of Maine challenges the fundamental structure of Maine's drug court system. [read post]