Search for: "Major J. Brown" Results 581 - 600 of 1,137
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2016, 12:48 pm
’Detective DeChant admitted, however, that the sheriff's department does not verify whether an offender is at his `secondary address,’ because `the majority of the time [the offender has] to stay at their current residence. [read post]
2 May 2016, 8:54 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Applicable Legal Standards  Official description: Actual and “red flag” knowledge requirements; financial benefit/right to control test; willful blindness; repeat infringers; good-faith requirements and Lenz; misrepresentation; fair use; use of representative lists; availability of injunctive relief; use of subpoenas; role of “standard technical measures”; and other pertinent issues. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 9:28 pm by Kim Kirschenbaum
Courts Regulating the Regulators Monday, April 25, 2016  | Christopher J. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by INFORRM
The public needs to be able to assess whether paying out around £500,000 per year to Gordon Brown, Tony Blair and John Major is a sensible use of its tax revenue at a time of austerity – and, indeed, whether the very existence of a non-statutory expense account for retired politicians is a good idea. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:37 am by John Jascob
The report largely opposed the proposed rules and recommended scrapping them or making major changes. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm by Brian E. Barreira
I am representing the Plaintiff in the Suffolk Superior Court case appealing Fair Hearing Decision 1409671, where the narrow issue is whether a home is “available” in the absence of a life estate or a trust provision allowing usage of the home. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm by Brian E. Barreira
I am representing the Plaintiff in the Suffolk Superior Court case appealing Fair Hearing Decision 1409671, where the narrow issue is whether a home is “available” in the absence of a life estate or a trust provision allowing usage of the home. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 7:18 am by Podhurst Orseck
But without Justice Scalia’s vote, it may be difficult for the court to get a majority on the question of whether the U.S. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 3:30 am by David Markus
Ct. at 1469 (quoting Brown v.Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 537, 73 S. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 2:45 pm by emagraken
If accepted, the evidence of these witnesses alone, and combined with the appellant’s evidence, supported a claim for past wage loss of some amount, and possibly a claim for future wage loss on the capital asset approach of Brown v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 11:12 pm by Kevin
Frankfurter served from 1939 until 1962, and is generally known as an advocate of judicial restraint although he was also a key figure in Brown v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  In other words, it is déjà vu all over again, and boards should not wait to act until after the world experiences the cyber-era equivalent of the 1929 stock market crash or the 2002 Enron collapse. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 1:18 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Vincent L. DiTommaso
”  One statement, which appears twice in almost identical language in the majority opinion … is that “enjoining speech harms listeners as well as speakers. [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 1:42 am by David Cheifetz
We don’t yet know Brown J’s views. [read post]