Search for: "Mark Harms" Results 581 - 600 of 10,288
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2020, 2:00 pm by Sami Azhari
This is particularly true in relation to federally protected marks, military goods, and various medical drugs. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 7:00 am
Unfortunately, it is also used at times for violence, bullying, and other acts that led to the physical and / or emotional harm to children. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 2:41 am by INFORRM
Mark Bunting is a member of Communications Chambers and a visiting associate of the Oxford Internet Institute. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 10:43 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Many of the marks rejected as disparaging convey hurtful speech that harms members of oft-stigmatized communities. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Hosted by Graeme Dinwoodie (DePaul/Oxford) & Mark Janis (Indiana) Session 1: Permissible Uses of Marks: Rationales and Sources of Law. [read post]
31 May 2017, 10:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The harm was from the sanctions imposed on the plaintiffs, which the CFPB had every right to impose. [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 7:37 am
If so, the competition will not be harmed. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 5:48 am by Eugene Volokh
” “[C]ases in which a defendant uses the plaintiff’s mark to refer to the plaintiff in a context that harms the plaintiff’s reputation are not properly treated as tarnishment cases. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 3:57 pm
The lifetime harm to children is well-known. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 3:26 am
It would be judicially inefficient to limit misrepresentation of source claims to cancellation proceedings as a plaintiff with facts supporting multiple claims, including misrepresentation of source, would not be able to bring all of its claims in a single opposition proceeding potentially leading to piecemeal litigation. * * * The potential harm to a plaintiff also might be compounded if it were required to wait until a mark registers to assert misrepresentation of source. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 7:46 pm by Old Fox
Minogue could suffer harm from having consumers confuse the two marks because of the criticism that Ms. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 12:08 am by Evan Brown (@internetcases)
It found that bad faith could be inferred from defendant’s intent to divert consumers from plaintiff’s online location to a site accessible under the disputed domain name that could harm the goodwill represented by plaintiff’s mark, either for commercial gain or with the intent to tarnish or disparage plaintiff’s mark, by creating a likelihood of confusion as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation, or endorsement of the site. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 6:27 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  (Query: what effect will the delay caused by the appeal have on Pom’s burden of showing irreparable harm under Herb Reed? [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 4:37 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Still, nearly a third think that digital life will be mostly harmful to people’s health, mental fitness and happiness. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by randal shaheen
The continued use and registration of the Certified Electronics Recycler® certification mark, BAN argues, erroneously suggests that only ISRI can certify a genuine “certified electronics recycler,” which harms BAN, its e-Stewards program, and the public. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 10:27 pm by John L. Welch
Thus the disposition of this case will likely turn on the similarity of the marks and the strength of the involved marks. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 3:24 am
The Board sustained an opposition to registration of the mark SCOTTSDALE TAXI for "taxi transport" services [TAXI disclaimed], finding the mark to be "highly geographically descriptive" and lacking in acquired distinctiveness. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 3:47 pm
California courts are clear that a jury gets to hear about the harm because it goes to "proximate cause" or foreseeability of the harm, and the past court decisions support that part of bring an injury case is to make sure the same harm does not happen again. [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 9:29 am
This advantage was subsequently reinforced by esure's investing in its mark.* Although it is not possible to provide hard evidence of dilution by blurring until after it has occurred, such harm can be inferred from the facts and actual evidence of the strength of the earlier mark and similarity between the two marks. [read post]