Search for: "Mark Strong" Results 581 - 600 of 10,796
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2022, 3:53 am
There was no evidence of third-party use of SCOOPER BOWL or similar marks, and so the Board found the SCOOPER BOWL mark to be "somewhat strong commercially" and entitled to "a slightly broader scope of protection on the spectrum of 'very strong to very weak.'"Turning to the marks, the Board noted that when the services are identical-in-part, a lesser degree of similarity between the marks is required to support a… [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 4:08 am
  October 20, 2022 - 1 PM: In re Chatham International Incorporated, Serial No. 90114379 [Section 2(d) refusal of STRONG ISLAND for "alcoholic beverages, except beer," in view of the registered mark STRONG ISLAND ALE for "Beer, ale, lager, stout and porter. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 3:15 am
However, the marks at issue differ in connotation and commercial impression: Opposer’s mark simply conjures a feeling of nostalgia for “pirates” or “piracy,” and this is certainly enhanced in the context of the goods, inasmuch as there is a strong association between rum and pirates. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 12:01 am by Kluwer IP Reporter
“While Trinidad and Tobago has a strong and efficient IP system, it is significantly under-utilized. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 1:09 am by Agnieszka Sztoldman (Taylor Wessing)
Furthermore, the CJEU confirmed that even if signs have a high degree of visual and aural similarity, strong conceptual dissimilarity may suffice to prevent a finding of likelihood of confusion – such as between the terms “messi’ and “massi”. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 8:09 am
Not surprisingly, Hillary's pollster Mark Penn thinks so. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 3:49 am
The Board concluded that the evidence fell short of establishing that the DON Q mark resides on the "very strong" end of the spectrum for likelihood of confusion purposes. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 2:59 am
Nor is there any evidence that guitars and music composition and production services travel in the same channels of trade.The Board concluded that although the marks are more similar than dissimilar, "Opposer’s mark is not strong enough, and the marks are not close enough, to overcome the lack of any evidence of a relationship between the goods and services, or that the channels of trade overlap. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 5:03 am
" The Board found that opposer's mark is inherently and conceptually strong "because it incongruously associates the legendary English outlaw Robin Hood with a 'Japanese dish of noodles in broth.'" As to commercial strength, the Board found that while opposer's restaurant is "obviously successful," there was little evidence to prove its renown beyond Los Angeles. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 3:22 am
The Board therefore found the similarity between this mark and the cited mark to be "very strong. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 4:35 am
" According to Opposer, "the conditions under which sales are made are in fact ripe to create consumer confusion given the strong similarity between the marks. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 5:57 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
                  The Senate also passed a non-binding resolution for the third consecutive year marking July 305h as National Whistleblower Appreciation Day. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 9:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  “A mark cannot be strong unless it is both conceptually and commercially strong. [read post]
The post <strong>Navigating the Burnout Epidemic in the Workplace</strong> appeared first on HR Daily Advisor. [read post]
16 May 2012, 3:25 am by John L. Welch
- ed.]Although the first word in the mark is often the part most likely to be remembered, here the strong commercial impression of the well-know figure Leonardo da Vinci is overpowering.A "handful" of third-party registrations for marks incorporating the term DAVINCI are not binding on the Board. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 10:40 am
For instance, road markings will fade over time, damage to the vehicles involved could be repaired, and eyewitnesses may forget what they saw. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 3:20 am
The Board concluded that "Plaintiff’s OMAHA STEAKS mark, as a whole, has achieved a strong degree of fame on the spectrum of “very strong to very weak. [read post]