Search for: "Mark v. Mark"
Results 581 - 600
of 34,663
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2007, 9:12 am
’s rights in the famous mark BARBIE were not enough to for our Supreme Court to find a likelihood of confusion with a restaurant operating under the name Barbie’s (Mattel, Inc. v. 3894207 Canada Inc., 2006 SCC 22). [read post]
9 May 2012, 8:34 am
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued its opinion in Maker’s Mark Distillery v. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 9:00 am
A recent decision Federal Court decision involving the manufacturer of Tupperware, Dart Industries Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:30 pm
Alas, Brigadier General Mark Martins, now the chief prosecutor of the military commissions, can’t blog for Lawfare any more, as he did when he was in the field in Afghanistan. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 3:18 pm
” Marks v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 12:16 pm
The Court also concluded that the mark was not purely or primarily functional. [read post]
1 May 2016, 12:08 am
Account of profits in trade mark infringement and passing off cases? [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 6:51 am
On March 17, 2010, Josh Slavitt, a registered patent attorney and a partner in the Philadelphia office of Pepper Hamilton who practices in all areas of intellectual property law, will be speaking on a teleconference and live audio webcast for the American Bar Association Center for Continuing Legal Education entitled “False Marking and Private Enforcement After Forest Group v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 7:28 am
Luka v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 5:29 am
Arnold J kicks off CJEU references in Sky v SkyKick After five days in court and 358 paragraphs, Mr Justice Arnold has just handed down his decision in Sky v Skykick [2018] EWHC 155. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 11:00 pm
In 2008, in McRae v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 8:58 am
" Simonian v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 12:04 pm
West v. [read post]
Judge Solis compares false marking to "someone who says, 'I am not married,' when indeed, they are."
22 Jun 2011, 5:35 am
VendEver LLC v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 2:37 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 7:10 pm
One or more words that might reasonably be required by a competitor to describe similar goods/service cannot be such a badge.I'm going to be lazy here and simply paste in the relevant section of Clark Equipment Co v Registrar of Trade Marks [(1964) 111 CLR 51, in which Kitto J said:"In Registrar of Trade Marks v W. and G. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 4:57 pm
Writing about the original Second Circuit opinion from last year, he says: The court even acknowledged that its decision to reject the “famous marks” doctrine conflicts with the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Grupo Gigante S.A. de C.V. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 6:15 pm
On Friday, September 17, 2010, I had the opportunity to chat with Professor Mark Lemley, who is the William H. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 6:36 am
Autodesk, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:37 am
234/06 P Il Ponte Finanziaria v OHIM -- and here it is again. [read post]
