Search for: "Marks v. Howe"
Results 581 - 600
of 14,330
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2014, 10:00 am
In Blackhorse v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 3:17 am
Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 2:16 am
By Mark A. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 12:15 pm
Arguably, we might view the period right before RTBF’s launch as the high-water mark of Internet freedom. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 1:47 am
(quoting Lincoln v. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 3:48 am
How do you thing this came out? [read post]
12 May 2007, 10:05 am
” The court dismissed plaintiff’s dilution claim without further comment.The case cite is Rubber Stamp Management, Inc., v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 3:21 pm
For example, if you are submitting evidence of use of the mark on a live website, you must also show how many users visited the site to demonstrate the extent of public exposure. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 3:21 pm
For example, if you are submitting evidence of use of the mark on a live website, you must also show how many users visited the site to demonstrate the extent of public exposure. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 1:01 am
How is that possible? [read post]
16 May 2013, 4:43 pm
TBC Trademarks, LLC v. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 3:20 am
What is required to prove that a trade mark has acquired distinctiveness through use? [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:05 am
” See Slip Opinion, at 18 (citing Hines v. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 7:18 am
And Slate’s Mark Joseph Stern has a jurisprudence essay titled “The Sam Alito Treatment: How the conservative justice’s searingly funny questions doomed Minnesota’s ban on political apparel at the polls. [read post]
26 May 2021, 7:33 am
The appellate court affirmed, however, the grant of summary judgment with respect to publications occurring prior to March 2015 (Martin v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 7:42 am
The rule laid out in Marks v. [read post]
The BASMATI saga: General Court accommodates extended passing off within Community trade mark system
3 Oct 2015, 2:58 am
In particular the GC noted how Article 8(4) (para 29) "covers non-registered trade marks and any ‘[other] sign’ used in the course of trade. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 12:01 pm
In Case R 513/2011-2 Société des Produits Nestlé S.A v Cadbury Holdings Ltd, Nestlé appealed a decision of the Cancellation Division finding the three-dimensional Community trade mark, consisting of four trapezoidal bars aligned on a rectangular base for 'Sweets; bakery products, pastries, biscuits; cakes, waffles' in Class 30, was devoid of distinctive character and had therefore been invalidly registered contrary to Art. 7(1)(b), Reg. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:43 am
Shoichi Matsumoto v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 5:06 am
A crucial factor in both rulings was the Board's finding that the mark GULPY and GULP create different commercial impressions. 7-Eleven, Inc. v. [read post]
