Search for: "Martinez v. Day"
Results 581 - 600
of 616
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2008, 7:42 pm
She notes that simply by considering these cases, courts have enabled such unions to enter the lexicon of the culturally "speakable" The writing of the paper appears to have predated last month's landmark decision in Martinez v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
These facts convince us that the "wrongful and injury-causing conduct ... that provides the foundation for the claim" (Martinez v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 6:14 am
Martinez, 2008 U.S. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 2:43 pm
(Recall: Martinez=23 years v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 6:47 am
The Second Circuit, in Ruis-Martinez v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
Martinez-Larraga, No. 06-40489 "Convictions and sentences for drug-related offenses are affirmed over claims that: 1) the prosecutor commented on their post-arrest, pre-trial, silence during its rebuttal closing argument; 2) the government improperly bolstered its witnesses' testimony during closing argument; and 3) the district court erred by denying one defendant a downward adjustment of his base offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. section 3B1.2. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 12:56 pm
As pointed out in the Sui Generis-a New York Law Blog, at issue in Martinez v. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:26 am
Martinez applied to the college two days later on July 7, 2004 for spousal health care benefits for Golden. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
Day, No. 05-4285 "Order resentencing defendant following his guilty plea to conspiring to distribute and possess with intent to distribute over one thousand kilograms of marijuana is vacated where the court violated: 1) defendant's right to be present at resentencing; 2) his right to notice that the court intended to impose an adverse non-Guidelines sentence; and 3) 18 U.S.C. section 3553(c), which requires a sentencing judge to state in open court the reasons for imposing a… [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 10:25 pm
Bassett v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 7:15 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 7:34 am
Martinez [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
Schwab v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
Schwab v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:16 pm
But the parties stipulated that "four days after the accident on July 16 . . . [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 1:59 pm
Supreme Court announced it would review lethal injection through Baze v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
The proposal to use electricity provoked legal wrangles between the Edison and Westinghouse companies which promoted, respectively, direct and alternating current.Following the first electrocution in 1890, Dr Alfred Southwick, the chair of the commission which recommended the electric chair, was reported as saying that "we live in a higher civilisation from this day"(5) though Thomas Edison reportedly "rebuked the doctors and said it was a mistake to have let them handle the… [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 7:29 am
The Court noted that in Martinez v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 11:17 pm
This is a case you gotta read.GRICE v. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 4:23 am
" County of Sacramento v. [read post]
