Search for: "Massachusetts v. EPA"
Results 581 - 600
of 722
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2008, 12:09 am
Massachusetts (2005) -- double jeopardySmall v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 8:48 am
They sue the EPA. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 6:09 am
In a groundbreaking climate decision, Massachusetts v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:36 am
Massachusetts, 14-10078, is a huge winner after nine relists. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 1:53 pm
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins on the occasion of the publication of “Business and the Roberts Court” (Oxford University Press, 2016, pp. 342), edited by Jonathan H. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
– Construction & Demolition Recycling, May 4, 2010 The Massachusetts Attorney General has announced that the owner of Northeast Demolition and Removal, as well as a company site foreman, have pled guilty to charges they violated the state’s Clean Air Act by failing to improperly remove asbestos from properties in Attleboro and North Attleborough, Mass. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am
EPA 15-599Issue: Whether the Third Circuit erred by deferring to EPA’s interpretation of the words “total maximum daily load” to permit EPA to impose a complex regulatory scheme that does much more than cap daily levels of total pollutant loading and that displaces powers reserved to the states. [read post]
19 May 2015, 9:05 am
EPA and U.S. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 6:48 am
EPA, No. 10-1031). [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 10:11 am
EPA, 127 S. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 6:06 am
In an op-ed for the Christian Science Monitor, Megan Brown describes the case as “novel, and far more aggressive and disruptive than” Massachusetts v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:03 am
EPA, ruling that the EPA could regulate greenhouse gases and that Massachusetts could sue the EPA for failing to do so, is the most important environmental decision in a generation. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 8:25 am
The Supreme Court held in Massachusetts v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 8:25 pm
No matter how many times the Supremes tell us that it's just too tacky to imagine them doing anything quite so infra dig as merely deciding cases (see post 7), it's very difficult to break the habit of thinking of the Court as a court.It's easy to fall into the trap of thinking that Massachusetts v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s 1992 decision in Franklin v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 6:41 am
Most notably and most recently, the California Supreme Court ruled for the defense in O’Neil v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 10:02 am
Massachusetts, 14-10078, which is probably on its ninth relist, and if so, surely an opinion of some sort is on the way. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm
Garcia v. [read post]
