Search for: "Matter of Cert. of a Question of Law"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,628
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2007, 6:00 am
Choice-of-law rules say that your lawsuit, no matter where it's filed, will be governed by Michigan law.If Michigan law governs your claim no matter where it's filed, why does it matter whether you sue in federal court in your home state of Michigan or in Pfizer's home state of New York? [read post]
8 May 2023, 1:50 pm
” The Cert Petition In January 2023, Murray filed a petition to the U.S. [read post]
18 May 2012, 8:02 am
The court also issued a unanimous opinion in the related LaRoque case, finding the issue mooted by DOJ’s belated preclearance of the law in question. [read post]
6 May 2009, 9:46 am
Deception of others in order to induce them to adopt technology that conflicts with the patent is a different matter. [read post]
19 May 2017, 4:10 am
” At the Washington Post’s Volokh Conspiracy blog, Orin Kerr flags a cert petition that raises the question of “whether the voluntariness of consent to search or seize under the Fourth Amendment should be treated as a matter of fact or a question of law for purposes of the standard of review on appeal. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 9:37 am
” Another concern was that the court might as a matter of constitutional law lack power to consider the case – because federal courts under the Constitution generally hold themselves powerless to consider cases where it is clear they can issue no effective relief. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 4:49 am
Barnard, 490 F. 2d 907, 912 (CA9 1973) (emphasis added), cert. denied, 416 U. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 2:51 am
Thus, reconsideration of those grounds is barred by the doctrine of law of the case (see Matter of Ise-Smith v Orok-Edem, 55 AD3d 610; Gropper v St. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm
(And does it matter?) [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:48 pm
But I also think that both must-carry laws and transparency laws are important and far more complicated, both as a matter of both policy and constitutional law, than these cases might suggest. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 11:28 am
See also this post about the decision from the Eminent Domain Law Blog. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 9:00 pm
The cert. denial includes a brief concurring opinion by three judges, a three-judge dissent, and a one-judge dissent. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 3:12 pm
Responding to a question from Chairman Johnson, I expressed the view that under the bill, there wouldn't be a large increase in the number of cert petitions filed by counsel as opposed to those filed pro se. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:39 pm
The DOJ lawyer never really answered the question--and with good reason, because it was, in effect, a rhetorical question with an obvious answer: Judge Kavanaugh was trying, not so subtly, to show DOJ that it's an absurd proposition and thus a dead loser. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 3:00 am
That matters, I think, because Fourth Amendment law has long developed different rules for searching containers and searching cars. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 10:02 am
Supreme Court to muster a quorum to consider the cert petition in Khulumani v. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 1:00 pm
The Colorado Supreme Court agreed in April 2020 to hear the Nieto case, and the matter is fully briefed before the Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 1:16 pm
It must be that the substantive constitutional law has changed enough that the matter is at least open to question in the lower courts. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
From the moment the Supreme Court granted cert in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:47 pm
The specific question presented by this case was whether the statute of limitations is tolled while a prisoner files a Supreme Court cert petition after the denial of state-court postconviction relief. [read post]
