Search for: "Matter of Goldstein"
Results 581 - 600
of 974
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2013, 7:49 am
Beck at Federal Regulations Advisor, The BLT’s Tony Mauro, Paul Daly at Administrative Law Matters, and Jaclyn Belczyk at JURIST. [read post]
18 May 2013, 12:52 pm
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as counsel to the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
17 May 2013, 7:17 am
Goldstein, P.C., the firm also represented the respondents in Bush v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:36 pm
(Disclaimer: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, were among the counsel to the petitioner in Allshouse.) [read post]
8 May 2013, 7:22 am
Goldstein, P.C., now known as Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, was among the counsel to respondent Al Gore in that case.] [read post]
7 May 2013, 10:00 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:48 am
[Disclosure: The law firm of Goldstein & Howe, P.C., now known as Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, was among the counsel to respondent Al Gore in that case.] [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 6:54 am
Symczyk, in which it held that the respondent’s suit was appropriately dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction when she had rejected petitioners’ settlement offer, as she had no personal interest in representing putative claimants. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
Ben announced the newest addition to the Wiki Project—a resource page for targeted killing compiled by law student Samantha Goldstein. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 11:15 am
Check out this summary from noted Supreme Court practitioner and watcher Tom Goldstein. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 10:54 am
As a practical matter, if you want to innovate in DVD or Blu-Ray, you need a license from content owners—and from competitors! [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:41 am
Myriad Genetics, in which the Court is considering whether human genes are patent-eligible subject matter. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:40 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 9:47 am
The Examiner rejected the additional information as new matter. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm
The Court will not be conferencing this week, meaning you get a week off from Relist Watch and we get to attend to other pressing matters. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 5:18 am
Last Monday was the deadline for comments on orphan works to be submitted to the U.S. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 5:45 am
According to department officials, the move will have a dramatic effect on medical licensing and physician disciplinary matters throughout Illinois. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in these cases.] [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 9:17 am
Represented by former Solicitor General Paul Clement, IMLA’s briefs argue that the jurisdictional category includes all agency decisions that “concern the who, what, where, and when of regulatory power: which subject matters an agency regulates and under what conditions. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 9:35 am
Introduction No case in administrative law has received more attention than Chevron U.S.A. [read post]
