Search for: "Matter of Ross"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,941
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2019, 6:17 am
Gordon, Jaren Janghorbani, and Ross A. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 12:05 pm
Hawaii: The Supreme Court is not ready to give the president carte blanche in immigration-related matters. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 6:35 am
See US Commerce’s Ross eyes anti-China ‘poison pill’ for new trade deals. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 12:40 pm
Cobb County contracts with First Transit for the CobbLinc service, and county spokesman Ross Cavitt said officials are waiting on details from the contractor. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 9:06 am
Roberts does not suggest that his analysis applies only to domestic matters, though full pretext scrutiny in national security cases may be a tougher sell. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 3:00 am
House Holds Barr and Ross in Contempt Over Census Dispute New York Times – Nicholas Fandos | Published: 7/17/2019 The U.S. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
What issues truly matter to the volatile trust-fund (alleged) billionaire living in the White House? [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 12:46 pm
In which the Ninth Circuit rules as a matter of law both that a trust beneficiaries' lawsuit is not barred by federal securities law and that the last season of Game of Thrones was bad. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 3:00 am
National/Federal 2020 Democrats Vow to Get Tough on Lobbyists The Hill – Alex Gangitano | Published: 7/7/2019 Democratic presidential hopefuls are taking aim at the lobbying world, vowing to enact sweeping reform proposals if they win election. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 9:05 pm
Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross announced that the U.S. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
If the Constitution requires that the question be asked, then it should not matter that Secretary Ross was motivated to ask it by a partisan reason, right? [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 12:57 pm
Under Gordon, “identical usage” could be [but is not always as a matter of law] explicitly misleading.Gordon added a mini-transformativeness inquiry into explicit misleadingness. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 5:30 am
” Thus, shelving Chevron deference altogether in cases that really matter is another component of Roberts’ emerging approach to managing the administrative state.Probably, the Chief Justice’s most significant sally into the thicket of judicial review of administrative action came during the present term, on the day before the census decision was announced. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
It is unlikely agency heads come into office without prior views, some firmly held, on controversial matters likely to come before them. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 7:48 pm
")And so that ought to be the end of the matter, right? [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 7:45 pm
Thank you to Ross Watkins for his contribution to this article. [1] National Transport Commission, A risk-based approach to regulating heavy vehicles. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 9:23 pm
Even if notionally the Administration claims to be starting completely over with a “new” decision-making process, leading to a new executive order, the haste of said process, and the involvement of high-level officials such as Secretary Ross in both processes, will make it difficult to plausibly sever the new order entirely from the original, years-long administration effort. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
National/Federal 2020 Census Will Not Include Citizenship Question, DOJ Confirms Philadelphia Inquirer – Ann Marimow, Matt Zapotosky, and Tara Bahrampour (Washington Post) | Published: 7/2/2019 In a defeat for President Trump, his administration ended its effort to add a citizenship question to the 2020 U.S. census, saying it will begin printing forms that do not include the contentious query. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 4:01 am
His argument relies on the mandatory “shall” even though his excuse is no less full of, ahem, falseness than Wilbur Ross’. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 8:24 pm
But it sounds like the Nike matter likewise involves a decision to cancel an already arranged plan; and just as the First Amendment bar on the government firing employees based on their First Amendment activity also applies to refusals to hire (Rutan v. [read post]
