Search for: "Melendez"
Results 581 - 600
of 872
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2010, 11:59 am
Previously, I wrote about the Melendez-Diaz opinion. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 10:50 am
Last year the Supreme Court decided Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 9:52 am
The one paragraph Per Curiam opinion remanded the case to the Supreme Court of Virginia ”for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 7:55 am
The one-paragraph opinion vacates the judgment below and remands for further proceedings not inconsistent with Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 7:19 am
Virginia (08-11191), the Court sent the case back to the Virginia Supreme Court for a new review in light of Melendez-Diaz. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 10:32 am
Massachusetts OUI lawyers are likely to raise 6th Amendment confrontation defenses under Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
Supervisor's Expert Testimony Did Not Violate Confrontation Clause By Describing Peer Review Process
19 Jan 2010, 12:38 am
7th.cir2_.png Supervisor expert testified about his role in the peer review process; passing reference to the testing chemist’s conclusion did not violate the Confrontation Clause; circuit also distinguishes Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 9:00 pm
On the other hand, Melendez-Diaz is so new that it may just be a matter of time for other appellate courts to rule that Melendez-Diaz bars records custodians' certificates without the testimony of such custodians. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 10:15 am
What Will Happen to Melendez-Diaz now? [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 9:00 pm
"I have decided to stick with love. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 3:11 am
Based on the recent Supreme Court decision of Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 12:14 pm
Consider the Melendez-Diaz case, where Coakley, not an appellate advocate, chose to appear personally before the United States Supreme Court, to argue that bothering prosecutors to produce hostile witnesses (in this case forensic examiners) in compliance with the Sixth Amendment, is just too burdensome. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 7:56 am
iStock_000000665117Medium.jpg The case considers the requirements underlying the Confrontation Clause and possibly whether the recent Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 4:47 am
It does make me confident, though, that SCOTUS decided the Melendez-Diaz case properly last year when they found that defendants had the right to cross-examine lab workers whose reports are presented as evidence at trial. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 11:00 am
As we’ve discussed, whether or not police lab experts can be cross-examined by criminal defense counsel was decided this summer in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 3:22 am
Last June, the Supreme Court ruled in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 11:56 am
In it's last term, the Supreme Court issued Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 8:18 am
Damn....In other news, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 9:00 pm
Virginia, which will decide how much of Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 4:45 am
SCOTUS will hear arguments in a follow up to Melendez-Diaz today. [read post]
