Search for: "Miller v. Doe" Results 581 - 600 of 3,646
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2022, 4:18 pm by Jon Sands
US v Napier, 463 F.3d 1040 (9th Cir 2006) does not require it. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 12:11 pm by Lyle Denniston
The federal government, in a brief filed by the Solicitor General, supported Montgomery’s plea to apply Miller retroactively and argued that the Court does have jurisdiction to decide that question. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 3:56 pm by Patricia Hughes
The UK Supreme Court’s decision in R (on the application of Miller) v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 5:11 pm
  That said, my book does discuss post-adoption debates such as those surrounding the so-called Blaine amendment. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 7:37 am
  In lieu of granting application for leave to appeal, the Court of Appeals denied Lenawee County’s appeal for the reason that under Miller v. [read post]
8 May 2010, 9:15 am by Matthew Nelson
Emmendorfer, 311 Mich. 274, 279 (1945) (holding that “[t]he statute of limitations does not control the question of laches in equitable actions”) and Stokes v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 9:23 am by Ben
”However note that "this does not mean authors can do as they please with their sources". [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 6:47 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This is from a 2003 case styled, New York Life Insurance Company, et al v. [read post]