Search for: "Minor v. Young"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,726
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2015, 2:36 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
Defendant Jorge Cardenas pleaded guilty to sexually abusing his minor daughter. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:43 am
M.A.M. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 9:29 pm
This doctrine was first recognized in the landmark 1920 case of Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 9:29 pm
This doctrine was first recognized in the landmark 1920 case of Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 10:30 pm
" I take it that his message to me is: be mindful . . . young padawan. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 2:37 pm
The Court explained that, while Louisiana’s minor tolling statute precludes the imputation of a parent’s knowledge to a minor child for limitations purposes, there was no such statute when Plaintiff was a minor, and Louisiana law does not permit retroactive application of the minor tolling statute. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 7:43 am
According to court records In the trial of Daniel Van Kruiningen and Kimberly Chatterton v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 8:45 am
This past Tuesday, the Supreme Judicial Court issued a decision in Commonwealth v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 11:17 am
Young v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
For example, in R. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 9:14 am
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, Brandt v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 1:14 pm
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 6:24 am
Additional Resources: Marks v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am
Content warning: This post contains content that may be upsetting for some readers. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 5:14 am
Additionally, this minor is clearly involved in a sexual act and each video file is of the same minor girl. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 2:49 pm
In a classic case of statutory interpretation, in which every technical thrust seemed to be met by an equally adept technical parry, Lockhart v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 10:58 am
Lopez challenged that condition in People v. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 1:20 pm
Part 6 of our series will review State v. [read post]
