Search for: "Minus v. State"
Results 581 - 600
of 878
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2013, 5:00 am
Wallace v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 12:13 pm
See United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 10:09 am
It is a 2004, case from the Houston Court of Appeals [1st Dist.] and is styled Hamby v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:34 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:41 am
The FDA states, 78 Fed. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 7:18 am
Hahn v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:08 am
Dewine, 696 F.3d 490 (6th Cir. 2012), about off-label use: “[I]t is standard medical practice in the United States for physicians to prescribe FDA-approved drugs in dosages and for medical indications that were not specifically approved − or even contemplated − by the FDA, particularly where the alternative use is supported by adequate study. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
See Brooks v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 11:54 am
Relying on the rightly-maligned “reasonably calculated” language in current Rule 26(b)(1), the magistrate’s opinion in McLane v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Comment k could correspond to Led Zeppelin, and state of the art might be The Who.And it seems that, for each of these bands, there’s a song we really like that gets slighted (in our opinion) when it comes to air time on classic rock stations. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 7:54 pm
Circuit (minus Judge Srinivasan) will confront in tomorrow’s oral argument in al Bahlul v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 6:53 pm
Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances --Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2013, 4:39 pm
Bartee won in State v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
That’s prisoner litigation − mostly convicts with nothing better to do with their time than try to sue their jailers. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 7:37 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), PLIVA v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 3:42 am
Clear Choice Holdings LLC v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 12:24 pm
Ray v. [read post]
31 Aug 2013, 1:40 am
Last week Judge Koh (United States District Court for the Northern District of California) denied a couple of Samsung motions that would, if granted, have delayed the limited Apple v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 3:51 pm
The load that Estes got caught with here (even minus the babies) was sold for over $75,000. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 10:20 am
Aug. 15, 2013), put it squarely in the red in explaining why no type of design defect claims survive preemption in generic drug cases after Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]
