Search for: "Mitchell v. People"
Results 581 - 600
of 707
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2009, 5:53 am
Whatever one thinks of Mitchell's reasoning, it's curious to learn that ADF again purports to find authority in Dean v. [read post]
24 Oct 2009, 8:55 am
In People v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
The Legal Aid Society; Real Estate Board of New York; New York State Tenants & Neighbors Coalition, Inc. et al.; Community Housing Improvement Program of New York Inc. et al.; Maria del Carmen Arroyo et al.; Rent Stabilization Association of New York City, Inc.; Office of Manhattan Borough President; Urban Justice Center; Mitchell-Lama Residents Coalition, amici curiae. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 10:19 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 12:20 pm
The Court also granted leave to appeal in People v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 8:45 am
The IPKat has just received a "Dear Interest" email from John Mitchell of the SME Innovation Alliance ("SMEIA"). [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 7:07 am
He cites the Brown v. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 4:50 am
The trial judge, though, in Mitchell v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Accordingly, assuming, without deciding, that Senator Skelos presently has standing to sue the Governor, we now proceed to the merits (see Matter of New York State Assn. of Criminal Defense Lawyers v Kaye, 96 NY2d 512, 516 [2001]; Babigian v Wachtler, 69 NY2d 1012, 1013 [1987]; Matter of Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v New York State Dept. of Health, 66 NY2d 948, 951 [1985]). [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 11:44 am
" Shrewd readers likely know that the US Supreme Court had an interesting discussion of the sentencing aspects of "right to silence" issues in its 1999 ruling in Mitchell v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 1:05 pm
Mitchell v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 11:02 am
The Mississippi case is Seale v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 5:36 am
"Then there's the anti-hippie ordinance (which prohibited people from sitting in a park at Carmel-by-the-Sea), which the California Supreme Court struck down in 1971 in Parr v. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 8:06 pm
However, they enjoy only qualified immunity when performing administrative, investigative, and national security functions (Mitchell v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 9:31 am
Mitchell, 63 Ill. 553 (1872). [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 7:25 am
" Springer v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 11:19 am
Back to Jones v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
New Massachusetts companies. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 4:10 am
"Mitchell H. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 8:34 am
Bottum of Morgan Theeler LLP in Mitchell, South Dakota, who represents Richard Vendrig. [read post]
