Search for: "Montana v. United States" Results 581 - 600 of 1,051
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2013, 6:35 am by Lyle Denniston
Stengel, on the right of patients to sue in state court over failure to warn of side-effects of medical devices; 12-1497, Kellogg Brown & Root v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 9:11 pm by Lyle Denniston
It has been nearly four years since the Supreme Court set off a constitutional revolution in the financing of federal elections, in Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 2:10 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
 Professor Lund disputed this, noting that the “pre-existing right” protected by the Second Amendment was the right as it existed in the United States under the common law and state constitutions, not the right as it existed under English law. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 6:06 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States, 450 U.S. 544 (1981) apply on tribal land, as this Court suggested in Nevada v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 6:06 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States, 450 U.S. 544 (1981) apply on tribal land, as this Court suggested in Nevada v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 11:14 am
United States v Harper, Department of Revenue of Montana v Kurth Ranch, Cordero v Lalor, and United States v Ursery settled that a sanction in a "civil" or non-criminal proceeding may constitute punishment for double jeopardy purposes. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 4:51 am by Amy Howe
Holder, to use the occasion “as an opportunity to affirm our nation’s commitment to the promises of equality and voting rights as guaranteed by the words of the United States Constitution. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 6:47 am by Joy Waltemath
Because a youth correctional facility acted reasonably and promptly in offering to transfer an officer once she made known she was being harassed by a sex offender, the Montana Supreme Court affirmed the dismissal of her sexual harassment, HWE, and retaliation claims (Puskas v Pine Hills Youth Correctional Facility, August 13, 2013, Morris, B). [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 10:52 am by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Montana. [read post]
21 Jul 2013, 8:17 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Grits has been heartened that several other states - so far Montana, Missouri and Maine, that I know of - have legislatively required a warrant for cell-phone location data, but New Jersey is the first state high court that I'm aware of to do so. [read post]