Search for: "Mr. Arnold"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,688
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2015, 2:32 pm
Mr. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 1:46 pm
Mr. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
The first of these is GO Outdoors Ltd v Skechers USA Inc II [2015] EWHC 1405 (Ch), a 19 May decision of Mrs Justice Rose, sitting in the Chancery Division, England and Wales, on an appeal from a decision of the UK Intellectual Property Office. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:39 am
", co-authored with leading British intellectual property judge and scholar Mr Justice Arnold. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:58 am
Mr Justice Richard Arnold and I have just completed an article [available here] on this very issue, that will be published by the Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice.The title of our contribution is Are national courts the addressees of the InfoSoc three-step test?. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 8:09 am
Mr Justice ArnoldThe judgmentArnold J concluded in the negative in relation to all three issues.In relation to the first point, the judge held that no contract could be considered as subsisting between the claimants and defendants. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 4:20 am
Clausen and Mr. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:51 pm
Mr. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 12:53 am
Phonographic Performance Limited v Fletcher is an extempore ruling by Mr Justice Arnold, sitting in the Chancery Division, England and Wales, last Monday; being extempore it isn't available on BAILII but it was noted in brief on the subscription-only Lawtel service. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
.* A novel becomes a saga - Actavis v Lilly set to go on and onThe IPKat blogged last year about the masterful and erudite judgment of Mr Justice Arnold in Actavis v Lilly (judgment on BAILII here), concerning pemetrexed. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:30 am
This Kat blogged last year about the masterful and erudite judgment of Mr Justice Arnold in the case of Actavis v Lilly (judgment on BAILII here), concerning pemetrexed. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 6:34 am
The august panel was as follows:Carol Arnold (Chair), President of the IP FederationCatriona Hammer, Immediate Past President, CIPAJanis Makarewich-Hall, Head of UPC Taskforce, UKIPOTracey Webb, UKIPO Lead, UPC Fee negotiationsMr Justice BirssKevin Mooney, Simmons & SimmonsAlan Johnson, BristowsRichard Vary, NokiaAfter initial comments from Carol Arnold, Catriona Hammer, and the IPO delegation, four topics were identified for discussion. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 4:14 am
In the court of first instance, Mr Justice Arnold had concluded in paragraph 146 that“I accept that the reputation which PCCM's NOW TV service had acquired amongst UK residents in the three ways I have described by 21 March 2012 was modest, but I do not consider that it was de minimis. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 7:13 am
Wathelet gives Nestlé application a bit of stickCJEU’s Advocate General Wathelet delivered his Opinion in the keenly-awaited dispute in Case C‑215/14Société des Produits Nestlé SA v Cadbury UK Ltd, a reference from Mr Justice Arnold in the Chancery Division of the High Court, England and Wales [noted by the IPKat here and here]. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 2:23 pm
Mr. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 10:46 am
This is a reference from Mr Justice Arnold in the Chancery Division of the High Court, England and Wales, on an appeal from the Trade Mark Registry. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 8:32 am
Mr. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 12:22 am
Mr Speck [Counsel for Actavis], for his part submits that it is not appropriate to fix on the word intention and then embark "on a wide ranging review of how the word 'intention' or 'intended' is used in different areas of the law" when the real issue is what the mental element in the claim is. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 12:31 pm
Mr. [read post]
