Search for: "Mr. Taylor"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,484
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2015, 6:06 am
This post is based on an article by Mr. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 5:01 am
Mr. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 6:30 am
Mr. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am
The Court summarily reversed in yet another qualified immunity case, Taylor v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Monday’s ruling in Taylor v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 4:03 pm
Mr. [read post]
28 May 2015, 1:38 pm
Copyright Office: Jacqueline CharlesworthMichelle ChoeRegan SmithCy DonnellySteve RuheJohn RileyStacy Cheney (NTIA) Note that my recap does not reflect all Qs because I was participating. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:23 am
Copyright Office: Jacqueline CharlesworthMichelle ChoeRegan SmithCy DonnellySteve RuheJohn RileyStacy Cheney (NTIA) Proposed Class 5: Audiovisual works – derivative uses – multimedia e-books This proposed class would allow circumvention of access controls on lawfully made and acquired motion pictures used in connection with multimedia e-book authorship. [read post]
21 May 2015, 4:05 pm
Mr Silverleaf’s opinion made the point that a Judge hearing the claim would be trying to reflect “both disapproval and deterrence”. [read post]
20 May 2015, 4:58 am
Mr. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 2:26 pm
Mr. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 7:27 am
Mr Fuentes has incidentally invested more than 50,000 Euros in filing fees. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 7:00 am
Most readers will probably not be aware of Mr Mykhailo Loginov and/or Loginov Enterprises doo (henceforth 'Loginov') in Serbia. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 10:27 am
Judge England said “I sat through the 10-day trial of Mr. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 12:56 pm
In doing so Mr. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:40 pm
Indeed, Mr. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 5:46 am
But Mr. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 7:31 am
Brad Taylor As it turns out, there can be some significant differences when it comes to tax treatment! [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 4:09 am
This Kat was reminded of the recusal situation in the patent action of Resolution v Lundbeck, where Mr Justice Arnold assured us that he was not swayed by his subconscious (see Katpost here).Nike and the Chuck Taylor sneaker: an epic billion dollar dispute (see Katpost here)Annabelle Gauberti spoke about how trade marks are being used in the US to protect the appearance of the Converse ‘Chuck Taylor’ sneaker. [read post]
