Search for: "NICHOLS v. THE STATE"
Results 581 - 600
of 616
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2007, 11:01 am
" Tonda Nichols v. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 6:35 am
In his opinion in State of New Mexico v. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 10:49 am
" Gene Nichols v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 7:00 pm
In Nichols v City of Taft, the Fifth District Court of Appeal holds that the use of a fee multiplier to compensate for the higher hourly rates of out-of-town counsel requires a sufficient showing -- which the Nichols failed to make -- that hiring local counsel was "impracticable. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 3:11 pm
In Nichols v. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 3:06 pm
In a recent spate of litigation, Jonathan Lee Riches © (JLR) has filed suit against a number of individuals, states, and an opinion of the Supreme Court. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 9:51 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2007, 6:49 pm
Mullinax relies on the decision in Nichols v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 5:10 am
Rice lost surprisingly 16-14 to Nicholls State in their opener while Baylor threw four interceptions against TCU to lose ineffectually 27-0. [read post]
Putting traffic detainee in back of police car was investigative technique but without justification
2 Sep 2007, 11:02 am
State v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:04 pm
For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM. 07a0312p.06 2007/08/13 USA v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:10 pm
Nichols argues that, based on Apprendi v. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 7:19 am
State v. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 11:24 am
Nichols v. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 5:57 am
Nichols does not say. [read post]
7 Jul 2007, 6:37 am
Bracewell v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 3:50 am
Copyright also protects the combinations of elements of the book to the extent that they are improperly appropriated (a good case for reference is Nichols v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 5:14 am
In Cream v Banerjee Lord Nicholls addressed this provision and said it demanded flexibility in its application. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 2:42 am
Going forward, it is to be hoped that, if applying Lord Nicholl’s criteria, the judiciary will not do so restrictively. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 11:14 am
Link: Zachariasewycz v. [read post]